% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Bernardo:277805,
author = {T. Bernardo and C. Behrends and D. Klein and A. Kuntze and
B. Timmermann$^*$ and C. von Neubeck},
title = {{S}imilar additive effects of doxorubicin in combination
with photon or proton irradiation in soft tissue sarcoma
models.},
journal = {Frontiers in oncology},
volume = {13},
issn = {2234-943X},
address = {Lausanne},
publisher = {Frontiers Media},
reportid = {DKFZ-2023-01516},
pages = {1211984},
year = {2023},
abstract = {High-precision radiotherapy with proton beams is frequently
used in the management of aggressive soft tissue sarcoma
(STS) and is often combined with doxorubicin (Dox), the
first-line chemotherapy for STS. However, current treatment
approaches continue to result in high local recurrence rates
often occurring within the treatment field. This strongly
indicates the need of optimized treatment protocols taking
the vast heterogeneity of STS into account, thereby
fostering personalized treatment approaches. Here, we used
preclinical STS models to investigate the radiation response
following photon (X) or proton (H) irradiation alone and in
combination with different treatment schedules of Dox. As
preclinical models, fibrosarcoma (HT-1080), undifferentiated
pleiomorphic sarcoma (GCT), and embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma
(RD) cell lines were used; the latter two are mutated for
TP53. The cellular response regarding clonogenic survival,
apoptosis, cell-cycle distribution, proliferation,
viability, morphology, and motility was investigated. The
different STS cell types revealed a dose-dependent radiation
response with reduced survival, proliferation, viability,
and motility whereas G2/M phase arrest as well as apoptosis
were induced. RD cells showed the most radiosensitive
phenotype; the linear quadratic model fit could not be
applied. In combined treatment schedules, Dox showed the
highest efficiency when applied after or before and after
radiation; Dox treatment only before radiation was less
efficient. GCT cells were the most chemoresistant cell line
in this study most probably due to their TP53 mutation
status. Interestingly, similar additive effects could be
observed for X or H irradiation in combination with Dox
treatment. However, the additive effects were determined
more frequently for X than for H irradiation. Thus, further
investigations are needed to specify alternative drug
therapies that display superior efficacy when combined with
H therapy.},
keywords = {additive effect (Other) / combined treatment (Other) /
doxorubicin (Other) / proton beam radiotherapy (Other) /
soft tissue sarcoma (Other)},
cin = {ED01},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)ED01-20160331},
pnm = {899 - ohne Topic (POF4-899)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:37503316},
pmc = {pmc:PMC10368985},
doi = {10.3389/fonc.2023.1211984},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/277805},
}