001     305583
005     20251101115631.0
024 7 _ |a 10.2967/jnumed.125.270239
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a pmid:41167722
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a 0097-9058
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 0022-3123
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 0161-5505
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1535-5667
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2159-662X
|2 ISSN
037 _ _ |a DKFZ-2025-02242
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Djaileb, Loïc
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Clinical Impact of Changes in Tumor Uptake and Volume on PSMA PET/CT During [177Lu]Lu-PSMA Therapy in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.
260 _ _ |a New York, NY
|c 2025
|b Soc.
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1761918027_171915
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
500 _ _ |a epub / brief communication
520 _ _ |a Although tumor volume and new lesions (NLs) have been investigated previously as measures of response, the clinical impact of changes in tumor uptake on prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET remains largely unknown. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study investigated the clinical impact of changes in tumor uptake and volume on PSMA PET during [177Lu]Lu-PSMA in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The primary outcomes were the associations of changes in SUVmax (ΔSUVmax) and SUVmean (ΔSUVmean), changes in total tumor volume (ΔTTV), and occurrence of NLs with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression-free survival (PSA-PFS) and overall survival (OS). The study included patients with mCRPC who received [177Lu]Lu-PSMA between 2014 and 2019. PSMA PET/CT was performed at baseline and after 2 cycles of therapy. Whole-body analyses (SUVmax, SUVmean, TTV, and NLs) were performed and calculated using qPSMA software. Results: In total, 124 patients with mCRPC (median age, 73 y; interquartile range, 67-76 y) were included in the study. Whole-body ΔTTV and the occurrence of NLs were significantly associated with shorter PSA-PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 5.7; 95% CI, 3.59-9.06; and HR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.4-1.8; P < 0.0001) and with OS (HR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.61-3.43; and HR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.4; P < 0.001). Patient-based analysis showed that ΔSUVmax and ΔSUVmean were not associated with outcome (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.99-1.00; P = 0.30; and HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.99-1.00; P = 0.11). Region-based analysis found that only ΔSUVmax in visceral lesions was significantly associated with PSA-PFS (P = 0.007) but not with OS. Conclusion: Only ΔTTV and the occurrence of NLs provided significant prognostic value and should be considered when evaluating treatment response to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA therapy.
536 _ _ |a 899 - ohne Topic (POF4-899)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899
|c POF4-899
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, , Journals: inrepo02.dkfz.de
650 _ 7 |a LuPSMA
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a PSMA PET
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a RECIP
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a radiopharmaceutical therapy
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a response evaluation
|2 Other
700 1 _ |a Farolfi, Andrea
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Rauscher, Isabel
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Haghighatian, Mahan
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Mercier, Alexis
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Fendler, Wolfgang P
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Hadaschik, Boris
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Herrmann, Ken
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Solnes, Lilja B
|b 8
700 1 _ |a Rettig, Matthew
|b 9
700 1 _ |a Weber, Manuel
|0 P:(DE-He78)44ee3b9a92e23f6844eefca1ab816eb9
|b 10
|u dkfz
700 1 _ |a Czernin, Johannes
|b 11
700 1 _ |a Calais, Jeremie
|b 12
700 1 _ |a Benz, Matthias R
|b 13
700 1 _ |a Eiber, Matthias
|b 14
700 1 _ |a Gafita, Andrei
|b 15
773 _ _ |a 10.2967/jnumed.125.270239
|g p. jnumed.125.270239 -
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2040222-3
|p nn
|t Journal of nuclear medicine
|v nn
|y 2025
|x 0097-9058
909 C O |o oai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:305583
|p VDB
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 5
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 6
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 7
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 10
|6 P:(DE-He78)44ee3b9a92e23f6844eefca1ab816eb9
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Programmungebundene Forschung
|l ohne Programm
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-890
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-800
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v ohne Topic
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2025
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b J NUCL MED : 2022
|d 2025-01-01
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2025-01-01
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2025-01-01
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2025-01-01
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
|d 2025-01-01
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2025-01-01
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1030
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Life Sciences
|d 2025-01-01
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1190
|2 StatID
|b Biological Abstracts
|d 2025-01-01
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1110
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Clinical Medicine
|d 2025-01-01
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2025-01-01
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2025-01-01
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b J NUCL MED : 2022
|d 2025-01-01
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)ED01-20160331
|k ED01
|l DKTK Koordinierungsstelle Essen/Düsseldorf
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)ED01-20160331
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21