% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Widjaja:305612,
author = {L. Widjaja and J. Hornfeck and S. C. Siegmund and F. J.
Gildehaus and N.-S. Schmidt-Hegemann and V. Wenter and G. T.
Sheikh and K. Klimek and J. Casuscelli and C. G. Stief and
M. J. Zacherl and R. A. Werner$^*$},
title = {{R}efining the clinical utility of
[177{L}u]{L}u/[225{A}c]{A}c-{PSMA} tandem {RLT} in patients
with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer.},
journal = {European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging},
volume = {nn},
issn = {1619-7070},
address = {Heidelberg [u.a.]},
publisher = {Springer-Verl.},
reportid = {DKFZ-2025-02262},
pages = {nn},
year = {2025},
note = {epub},
abstract = {This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of
Lutetium-177/Actinium-225 prostate-specific membrane antigen
tandem radioligand therapy ([177Lu]Lu/[225Ac]Ac-PSMA tandem
RLT) and to explore clinical and imaging-based predictors of
treatment response to support individualized patient
selection.This retrospective, single-center study included
23 patients with mCRPC who underwent Fluor-18
([18F]F)-PSMA-1007 positron emission tomography/computed
tomography (PET/CT) and subsequent tandem RLT. Whole-body
tumor segmentation on PET/CT and standard laboratory values
were acquired before treatment initiation. Primary endpoint
was partial response (PR), defined as either a decline in
prostate specific antigen of ≥ $50\%$ (according to
prostate cancer clinical trial working group) or PET-based
response according to Response Evaluation Criteria on PSMA
PET/CT. Safety assessment included renal and hematological
side effects following common terminology criteria of
adverse events version 5.Following two cycles of tandem RLT,
11 patients $(48\%)$ achieved a PR. The treatment was
generally tolerated well. Grade 3 events included renal
impairment in two $(9\%)$ and grade 3 anemia in five
$(22\%)$ patients, while no Grade 4/5 events occurred.
Patients with increased PSMA expression on pretherapeutic
PET (defined by the average mean standardized uptake value
of all tumor lesions [SUVmean]) had a higher response rate
$(86\%;$ 6 out of 7) compared to those with decreased
SUVmean $(31\%;$ 5 out of 16). In Cox regression analysis,
SUVmean was significantly associated with PR with a hazard
ratio of 1.34 $(95\%$ CI, 1.01-1.77; P = 0.042). PSMA-tumor
volume (P = 0.036) and total lesion-PSMA (P = 0.041) were
also significant predictors, whereas none of the clinical
parameters showed predictive value. Kaplan-Meier analysis
further confirmed SUVmean as the strongest PR (P =
0.003).[177Lu]Lu/[225Ac]Ac-PSMA tandem RLT may offer a safe,
effective treatment option. Assessment of PSMA expression on
pretherapeutic PET predicts response, supporting its use in
guiding personalized treatment.},
keywords = {PSMA-RLT (Other) / Prostate cancer (Other) / Tandem RLT
(Other) / Targeted alpha therapy (Other)},
cin = {MU01},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)MU01-20160331},
pnm = {899 - ohne Topic (POF4-899)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:41174098},
doi = {10.1007/s00259-025-07632-1},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/305612},
}