% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Lustermans:305672,
author = {D. Lustermans and G. P. Fonseca and C. Jeukens and V. T.
Taasti and K. Parodi and G. Landry$^*$ and F. Verhaegen},
title = {{A}ssessing quantitative material characteristics with low
dose imaging in photon-counting and dual-energy computed
tomography for radiotherapy.},
journal = {Physics in medicine and biology},
volume = {70},
number = {22},
issn = {0031-9155},
address = {Bristol},
publisher = {IOP Publ.},
reportid = {DKFZ-2025-02302},
pages = {225008},
year = {2025},
abstract = {Objective.Photon-counting computed tomography (CT) is an
advanced imaging technique that detects individual photons
by energy, offering spectral imaging. While its application
in radiotherapy remains under-explored, photon-counting CT
(PCCT) could provide quantitative accuracy, particularly in
proton stopping-power ratio (SPR) estimation, while it also
potentially enables consistent low-dose imaging. This study
evaluates estimation accuracy for relative electron density
(RED), effective atomic number (Zeff), and SPR under
low-dose conditions. This could be beneficial for repeated
imaging in radiotherapy.Approach.A Gammex Advanced Electron
Density phantom (Sun Nuclear) was scanned on a PCCT at 120
kVp with varying imaging doses (5 mGy (low dose), 20 mGy,
and 40 mGy). Virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) were
generated with energies of 40-70 and 150-190 keV (10 keV
increments). Performance was compared to dual-energy CT
(DECT) acquisition (80/140 kVp) using the SOMATOM Confidence
scanner with similar dose levels, and identically VMIs were
generated as for PCCT. Mean ± standard deviation (SD) of CT
numbers was quantified for tissue-equivalent phantom
inserts. Furthermore, the physical quantities, RED,Zeff, and
SPR accuracies were determined under high- and low-dose
imaging conditions by quantifying the
root-mean-squared-error (RMSE).Main results.PCCT generally
showed lower CT number SD than DECT, while for both
modalities, the SD increased at lower imaging dose. In
addition, PCCT retained consistent mean CT numbers
(differences up to 15 Hounsfield Unit (HU)), while DECT
showed large CT number variations at 5 mGy (up to 1000 HU)
in bone compared to higher dose. The accuracy of the
physical quantities was independent of the dose for PCCT
$(0.7\%-0.9\%$ SPR RMSE), whereas DECT demonstrated larger
differences with dose $(1.1\%-4.6\%$ SPR
RMSE).Significance.This study demonstrated that PCCT retains
quantitative accuracy in low imaging dose conditions,
outperforming DECT. This could be valuable for pediatric
patients and in repeated imaging to reduce the cumulative
dose.},
keywords = {Photons / Phantoms, Imaging / Tomography, X-Ray Computed:
methods / Tomography, X-Ray Computed: instrumentation /
Radiation Dosage / Humans / Radiotherapy Dosage / low
imaging dose (Other) / photon-counting CT (Other) /
quantitative imaging (Other) / radiotherapy (Other) /
spectral CT (Other) / virtual monoenergetic imaging (Other)},
cin = {MU01},
ddc = {530},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)MU01-20160331},
pnm = {899 - ohne Topic (POF4-899)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:41082908},
doi = {10.1088/1361-6560/ae128c},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/305672},
}