% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Fazeli:307439,
author = {A. Fazeli and E. Ullrich$^*$ and T. Cathomen$^*$ and T.
Bexte$^*$},
title = {{E}ngineering with care: safety assessment platforms for
{CRISPR}-modified natural killer cells.},
journal = {Frontiers in immunology},
volume = {16},
issn = {1664-3224},
address = {Lausanne},
publisher = {Frontiers Media},
reportid = {DKFZ-2025-03038},
pages = {1711414},
year = {2025},
abstract = {CRISPR-based gene editing has become a transformative tool
to enhance immune cell therapies. In particular, engineering
natural killer (NK) cells with CRISPR/Cas systems has gained
traction due to their ability to mediate strong anti-tumor
responses in an MHC-unrestricted, non-alloreactive manner.
Early trials show the feasibility and safety of allogeneic
NK cells, paving the way as scalable 'off-the-shelf'
products. CRISPR/Cas9 edits genomes by inducing DNA
double-strand breaks (DSBs), mainly repaired through
non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) or homology-directed
repair (HDR). While effective, CRISPR carries risks of
off-target (OT) activity that may disrupt essential genes,
cause chromosomal rearrangements, or trigger oncogenic
changes - posing threats to product integrity and patient
safety. These concerns intensify with multiplex editing,
where multiple loci are modified to improve function,
persistence, and immune evasion. Since unmodified NK cells
are typically short-lived, many clinical-stage products are
engineered to express IL-15 or related constructs, extending
their half-life and amplifying risks associated with
unintended changes. This underscores the urgent need for
robust safety assessments. In this review, we summarize the
current landscape of safety assessment platforms for
evaluating gene edited NK cells. We highlight predictive in
silico tools, biochemical in vitro assays, and emerging
cell-based detection systems to identify and quantify
CRISPR-induced OT events. Particular attention is given to
their suitability, limitations, and practical use in primary
NK cells and multiplex editing strategies. Our aim is to
support the design of safe, effective editing workflows for
NK cell therapies - ensuring rigor as the field advances
rapidly toward clinical application.},
subtyp = {Review Article},
keywords = {Killer Cells, Natural: immunology / Killer Cells, Natural:
metabolism / Killer Cells, Natural: transplantation / Humans
/ Gene Editing: methods / CRISPR-Cas Systems / Animals /
Immunotherapy, Adoptive: methods / Immunotherapy, Adoptive:
adverse effects / CRISPR (Other) / NK cells (Other) /
allogenic (Other) / cell therapy (Other) / gene-editing
(Other) / off-target (Other) / safety assessment (Other)},
cin = {FM01 / FR01},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)FM01-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)FR01-20160331},
pnm = {899 - ohne Topic (POF4-899)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:41425600},
pmc = {pmc:PMC12714958},
doi = {10.3389/fimmu.2025.1711414},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/307439},
}