001     307530
005     20260220120942.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1007/s00259-025-07686-1
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a pmid:41483304
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a 1619-7070
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1619-7089
|2 ISSN
037 _ _ |a DKFZ-2026-00035
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Debus, Josefin
|0 0009-0006-5346-6965
|b 0
245 _ _ |a 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT for non-invasive characterization and activity assessment of ulcerative colitis and Crohn´s disease.
260 _ _ |a Heidelberg [u.a.]
|c 2026
|b Springer-Verl.
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1767622283_2785347
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
500 _ _ |a epub
520 _ _ |a Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD) comprise ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). Management of IBD requires assessment of disease activity, severity, extent and complications. Here, we describe the signal behavior of both CD and UC in 68Gallium- fibroblast activation protein inhibitor-based radiopharmaceuticals-46-positron emission tomography (68Ga-FAPI-46-PET) and evaluate the potential of 68Ga-FAPI-46-PET for activity assessment in IBD.This analysis includes data of 43 IBD patients and 43 control patients examined by 68Ga-FAPI-46-PET/computed tomography (CT). Disease activity of IBD patients was assessed by colonoscopy. FAPI-positive gastrointestinal tract (GIT)-findings and healthy appearing GI structures were contoured. Non-IBD related FAPI-positive GIT-findings were ruled out by interdisciplinary consensus. Static and dynamic PET-parameters of FAPI-positive IBD lesions and healthy appearing GI structures were extracted and PET signalling was analyzed with respect to IBD subtype and disease activity.We examined 20 CD patients and 23 UC patients (29 with active, 14 with inactive disease). FAPI-uptake in most healthy appearing GI structures of IBD patients was significantly increased compared to controls. Of 80 FAPI-positive GIT-findings, 14 were ruled out as non-IBD related and 66 FAPI-positive IBD lesions were analyzed. We observed equally high lesional FAPI-uptake in CD and UC. All patients with active disease showed at least one intensively FAPI-positive IBD lesion, while only 4/14 patients with inactive disease showed any FAPI-positive IBD lesion. Lesional and patientwise FAPI-uptake was significantly higher in active than in inactive disease. FAPI-positive IBD lesions showed a characteristic kinetic behaviour with two types of uptake patterns - one showing a continuous increase and the other an early peak followed by a plateau.68Ga-FAPI-46-PET/CT appears promising for assessing disease activity in terms of fibroblast activation in both CD and UC.
536 _ _ |a 315 - Bildgebung und Radioonkologie (POF4-315)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315
|c POF4-315
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, , Journals: inrepo02.dkfz.de
650 _ 7 |a Crohn´s disease
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a FAPI
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Fibroblasts
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a IBD disease activity
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Ulcerative colitis
|2 Other
700 1 _ |a von Götze, Isabelle
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Brandt, Johannes
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Ehehalt, Robert
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Spektor, Anna-Maria
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Mildenberger, Philipp
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Gauss, Annika
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Lang, Matthias
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Glatting, Frederik M
|b 8
700 1 _ |a Schreckenberger, Mathias
|b 9
700 1 _ |a Kalla, Rahul
|b 10
700 1 _ |a Haberkorn, Uwe
|0 P:(DE-He78)13a0afba029f5f64dc18b25ef7499558
|b 11
|u dkfz
700 1 _ |a Röhrich, Manuel
|0 0000-0001-7609-243X
|b 12
773 _ _ |a 10.1007/s00259-025-07686-1
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2098375-X
|p nn
|t European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
|v nn
|y 2026
|x 1619-7070
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|u https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/307530/files/s00259-025-07686-1.pdf
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x pdfa
|u https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/307530/files/s00259-025-07686-1.pdf?subformat=pdfa
909 C O |o oai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:307530
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 11
|6 P:(DE-He78)13a0afba029f5f64dc18b25ef7499558
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Gesundheit
|l Krebsforschung
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-310
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-300
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Bildgebung und Radioonkologie
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2026
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2024-12-05
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2024-12-05
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2024-12-05
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2024-12-05
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b EUR J NUCL MED MOL I : 2022
|d 2024-12-05
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1030
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Life Sciences
|d 2024-12-05
915 _ _ |a DEAL Springer
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)3002
|2 StatID
|d 2024-12-05
|w ger
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2024-12-05
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2024-12-05
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b EUR J NUCL MED MOL I : 2022
|d 2024-12-05
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2024-12-05
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1110
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Clinical Medicine
|d 2024-12-05
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2024-12-05
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)E060-20160331
|k E060
|l E060 KKE Nuklearmedizin
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)E060-20160331
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21