% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Caers:119720,
      author       = {J. Caers and N. Withofs and J. Hillengass$^*$ and P. Simoni
                      and E. Zamagni and R. Hustinx and Y. Beguin},
      title        = {{T}he role of positron emission tomography-computed
                      tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis and
                      follow up of multiple myeloma.},
      journal      = {Haematologica},
      volume       = {99},
      number       = {4},
      issn         = {1592-8721},
      address      = {Pavia},
      publisher    = {Ferrata Storti Foundation},
      reportid     = {DKFZ-2017-00347},
      pages        = {629 - 637},
      year         = {2014},
      abstract     = {Multiple myeloma is the second most common hematologic
                      malignancy and occurs most commonly in elderly patients.
                      Almost all multiple myeloma patients develop bone lesions in
                      the course of their disease or have evidence of bone loss at
                      initial diagnosis. Whole-body conventional radiography
                      remains the gold standard in the diagnostic evaluation, but
                      computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and
                      18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography are
                      increasingly used as complementary techniques in the
                      detection of bone lesions. Moreover, the number of lesions
                      detected and the presence of extramedullary disease give
                      strong prognostic information. These new techniques may help
                      to assess treatment response in solitary plasmacytoma or in
                      multiple myeloma. In this article, we review recent data on
                      the different imaging techniques used at diagnosis and in
                      the assessment of treatment response, and discuss some
                      current issues.},
      cin          = {E013},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-He78)E013-20160331},
      pnm          = {315 - Imaging and radiooncology (POF3-315)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-315},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:24688111},
      pmc          = {pmc:PMC3971072},
      doi          = {10.3324/haematol.2013.091918},
      url          = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/119720},
}