% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Claus:119761,
author = {R. Claus$^*$ and D. M. Lucas and A. S. Ruppert and K. E.
Williams and D. Weng and K. Patterson and M. Zucknick$^*$
and C. C. Oakes$^*$ and L. Z. Rassenti and A. W. Greaves and
S. Geyer and W. G. Wierda and J. R. Brown and J. G. Gribben
and J. C. Barrientos and K. R. Rai and N. E. Kay and T. J.
Kipps and P. Shields and W. Zhao and M. R. Grever and C.
Plass$^*$ and J. C. Byrd},
title = {{V}alidation of {ZAP}-70 methylation and its relative
significance in predicting outcome in chronic lymphocytic
leukemia.},
journal = {Blood},
volume = {124},
number = {1},
issn = {1528-0020},
address = {Stanford, Calif.},
publisher = {HighWire Press},
reportid = {DKFZ-2017-00388},
pages = {42 - 48},
year = {2014},
abstract = {ZAP-70 methylation 223 nucleotides downstream of
transcription start (CpG+223) predicts outcome in chronic
lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), but its impact relative to CD38
and ZAP-70 expression or immunoglobulin heavy chain variable
region (IGHV) status is uncertain. Additionally,
standardizing ZAP-70 expression analysis has been
unsuccessful. CpG+223 methylation was quantitatively
determined in 295 untreated CLL cases using MassARRAY.
Impact on clinical outcome vs CD38 and ZAP-70 expression and
IGHV status was evaluated. Cases with low methylation
$(<20\%)$ had significantly shortened time to first
treatment (TT) and overall survival (OS) (P < .0001). For
TT, low methylation defined a large subset of ZAP-70
protein-negative cases with significantly shortened TT
(median, 8.0 vs 3.9 years for high vs low methylation;
hazard ratio [HR] = 0.43; $95\%$ confidence interval [CI],
0.25-0.74). Conversely, 16 ZAP-70 protein-positive cases
with high methylation had poor outcome (median, 1.1 vs 2.3
years for high vs low methylation; HR = 1.62; $95\%$ CI,
0.87-3.03). For OS, ZAP-70 methylation was the strongest
risk factor; CD38 and ZAP-70 expression or IGHV status did
not significantly improve OS prediction. A pyrosequencing
assay was established that reproduced the MassARRAY data (κ
coefficient > 0.90). Thus, ZAP-70 CpG+223 methylation
represents a superior biomarker for TT and OS that can be
feasibly measured, supporting its use in risk-stratifying
CLL.},
keywords = {Biomarkers, Tumor (NLM Chemicals) / Immunoglobulin Variable
Region (NLM Chemicals) / ZAP-70 Protein-Tyrosine Kinase (NLM
Chemicals) / ZAP70 protein, human (NLM Chemicals)},
cin = {C010 / C060},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C010-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)C060-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Cancer risk factors and prevention (POF3-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:24868078},
pmc = {pmc:PMC4125353},
doi = {10.1182/blood-2014-02-555722},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/119761},
}