% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Ernst:125241,
author = {T. M. Ernst and M. Thürling and S. Müller and F. Kahl and
S. Maderwald and M. Schlamann and H.-J. Boele and S. K. E.
Koekkoek and J. Diedrichsen and C. I. De Zeeuw and M.
Ladd$^*$ and D. Timmann},
title = {{M}odulation of 7 {T} f{MRI} {S}ignal in the {C}erebellar
{C}ortex and {N}uclei {D}uring {A}cquisition, {E}xtinction,
and {R}eacquisition of {C}onditioned {E}yeblink
{R}esponses.},
journal = {Human brain mapping},
volume = {38},
number = {8},
issn = {1065-9471},
address = {New York, NY},
publisher = {Wiley-Liss},
reportid = {DKFZ-2017-01396},
pages = {3957 - 3974},
year = {2017},
abstract = {Classical delay eyeblink conditioning is likely the most
commonly used paradigm to study cerebellar learning. As yet,
few studies have focused on extinction and savings of
conditioned eyeblink responses (CRs). Saving effects, which
are reflected in a reacquisition after extinction that is
faster than the initial acquisition, suggest that learned
associations are at least partly preserved during
extinction. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that
acquisition-related plasticity is nihilated during
extinction in the cerebellar cortex, but retained in the
cerebellar nuclei, allowing for faster reacquisition.
Changes of 7 T functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)
signals were investigated in the cerebellar cortex and
nuclei of young and healthy human subjects. Main effects of
acquisition, extinction, and reacquisition against rest were
calculated in conditioned stimulus-only trials. First-level
β values were determined for a spherical region of interest
(ROI) around the acquisition peak voxel in lobule VI, and
dentate and interposed nuclei ipsilateral to the
unconditioned stimulus. In the cerebellar cortex and nuclei,
fMRI signals were significantly lower in extinction compared
to acquisition and reacquisition, but not significantly
different between acquisition and reacquisition. These
findings are consistent with the theory of bidirectional
learning in both the cerebellar cortex and nuclei. It cannot
explain, however, why conditioned responses reappear almost
immediately in reacquisition following extinction. Although
the present data do not exclude that part of the initial
memory remains in the cerebellum in extinction, future
studies should also explore changes in extracerebellar
regions as a potential substrate of saving effects. Hum
Brain Mapp 38:3957-3974, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals,
Inc.},
cin = {E020},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)E020-20160331},
pnm = {315 - Imaging and radiooncology (POF3-315)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-315},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:28474470},
doi = {10.1002/hbm.23641},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/125241},
}