% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Bickelhaupt:125374,
author = {S. Bickelhaupt$^*$ and D. Paech$^*$ and P.
Kickingereder$^*$ and F. Steudle$^*$ and W. Lederer and H.
Daniel and M. Götz$^*$ and N. Gählert$^*$ and D. Tichy$^*$
and M. Wiesenfarth$^*$ and F. Laun$^*$ and K. Maier-Hein$^*$
and H.-P. Schlemmer$^*$ and D. Bonekamp$^*$},
title = {{P}rediction of malignancy by a radiomic signature from
contrast agent-free diffusion {MRI} in suspicious breast
lesions found on screening mammography.},
journal = {Journal of magnetic resonance imaging},
volume = {46},
number = {2},
issn = {1053-1807},
address = {New York, NY},
publisher = {Wiley-Liss},
reportid = {DKFZ-2017-01507},
pages = {604 - 616},
year = {2017},
abstract = {To assess radiomics as a tool to determine how well lesions
found suspicious on breast cancer screening X-ray
mammography can be categorized into malignant and benign
with unenhanced magnetic resonance (MR) mammography with
diffusion-weighted imaging and T2 -weighted sequences.From
an asymptomatic screening cohort, 50 women with
mammographically suspicious findings were examined with
contrast-enhanced breast MRI (ceMRI) at 1.5T. Out of this
protocol an unenhanced, abbreviated diffusion-weighted
imaging protocol (ueMRI) including T2 -weighted, (T2 w),
diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and DWI with background
suppression (DWIBS) sequences and corresponding apparent
diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps were extracted. From
ueMRI-derived radiomic features, three Lasso-supervised
machine-learning classifiers were constructed and compared
with the clinical performance of a highly experienced
radiologist: 1) univariate mean ADC model, 2) unconstrained
radiomic model, 3) constrained radiomic model with mandatory
inclusion of mean ADC.The unconstrained and constrained
radiomic classifiers consisted of 11 parameters each and
achieved differentiation of malignant from benign lesions
with a .632 + bootstrap receiver operating
characteristics (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) of
$84.2\%/85.1\%,$ compared to $77.4\%$ for mean ADC and
$95.9\%/95.9\%$ for the experienced radiologist using
ceMRI/ueMRI.In this pilot study we identified two ueMRI
radiomics classifiers that performed well in the
differentiation of malignant from benign lesions and
achieved higher performance than the mean ADC parameter
alone. Classification was lower than the almost perfect
performance of a highly experienced breast radiologist. The
potential of radiomics to provide a training-independent
diagnostic decision tool is indicated. A performance
reaching the human expert would be highly desirable and
based on our results is considered possible when the concept
is extended in larger cohorts with further development and
validation of the technique.1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J.
MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2017;46:604-616.},
cin = {E010 / E012 / E132 / C060 / E020},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)E010-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)E012-20160331 /
I:(DE-He78)E132-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)C060-20160331 /
I:(DE-He78)E020-20160331},
pnm = {315 - Imaging and radiooncology (POF3-315)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-315},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:28152264},
doi = {10.1002/jmri.25606},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/125374},
}