% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Deike:125685,
author = {K. Deike$^*$ and B. P. O. Wiestler$^*$ and M. Graf$^*$ and
C. Reimer and R. O. Floca$^*$ and P. Bäumer$^*$ and P.
Kickingereder$^*$ and S. Heiland and H.-P. Schlemmer$^*$ and
W. Wick$^*$ and M. Bendszus and A. Radbruch$^*$},
title = {{P}rognostic value of combined visualization of {MR}
diffusion and perfusion maps in glioblastoma.},
journal = {Journal of neuro-oncology},
volume = {126},
number = {3},
issn = {1573-7373},
address = {Dordrecht [u.a.]},
publisher = {Springer Science + Business Media B.V},
reportid = {DKFZ-2017-01811},
pages = {463 - 472},
year = {2016},
abstract = {We analyzed whether the combined visualization of decreased
apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and increased
cerebral blood volume (CBV) in perfusion imaging can
identify prognosis-related growth patterns in patients with
newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Sixty-five consecutive
patients were examined with diffusion and dynamic
susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion weighted
MRI. ADC and CBV maps were co-registered on the T1-w image
and a region of interest (ROI) was manually delineated
encompassing the enhancing lesion. Within this ROI pixels
with ADC values <the 30th percentile (ADCmin), pixels with
CBV values >the 70th percentile (CBVmax) and the
intersection of pixels with ADCmin and CBVmax were
automatically calculated and visualized. Initially, all
tumors with a mean intersection greater than the upper
quartile of the normally distributed mean intersection of
all patients were subsumed to the first growth pattern
termed big intersection (BI). Subsequently, the remaining
tumors' growth patterns were categorized depending on the
qualitative representation of ADCmin, CBVmax and their
intersection. Log-rank test exposed a significantly longer
overall survival of BI (n = 16) compared to non-BI group (n
= 49) (p = 0.0057). Thirty-one, four and 14 patients of the
non-BI group were classified as predominant ADC-, CBV- and
mixed growth group, respectively. In a multivariate Cox
regression model, the BI-, CBV- and mixed groups had
significantly lower adjusted hazard ratios (p-value,
α(Bonferroni) < 0.006) when compared to the reference group
ADC: 0.29 (0.0027), 0.11 (0.038) and 0.33 (0.0059). Our
study provides evidence that the combination of diffusion
and perfusion imaging allows visualization of different
glioblastoma growth patterns that are associated with
prognosis. A possible biological hypothesis for this finding
could be the interpretation of the ADCmin fraction as the
invasion-front of tumor cells while the CBVmax fraction
might represent the vascular rich tumor border that is
'trailing behind' the invasion-front in the ADC group.},
cin = {E012 / G370 / C020 / E071 / E010 / L101},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)E012-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)G370-20160331 /
I:(DE-He78)C020-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)E071-20160331 /
I:(DE-He78)E010-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)L101-20160331},
pnm = {315 - Imaging and radiooncology (POF3-315)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-315},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:26518541},
doi = {10.1007/s11060-015-1982-z},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/125685},
}