% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Jiang:126072,
author = {X. Jiang$^*$ and A. Kopp-Schneider$^*$},
title = {{S}ummarizing {EC}50 estimates from multiple dose-response
experiments: a comparison of a meta-analysis strategy to a
mixed-effects model approach.},
journal = {Biometrical journal},
volume = {56},
number = {3},
issn = {0323-3847},
address = {Berlin},
publisher = {Wiley-VCH},
reportid = {DKFZ-2017-02187},
pages = {493 - 512},
year = {2014},
abstract = {Dose-response studies are performed to investigate the
potency of a compound. EC50 is the concentration of the
compound that gives half-maximal response. Dose-response
data are typically evaluated by using a log-logistic model
that includes EC50 as one of the model parameters. Often,
more than one experiment is carried out to determine the
EC50 value for a compound, requiring summarization of EC50
estimates from a series of experiments. In this context,
mixed-effects models are designed to estimate the average
behavior of EC50 values over all experiments by considering
the variabilities within and among experiments
simultaneously. However, fitting nonlinear mixed-effects
models is more complicated than in a linear situation, and
convergence problems are often encountered. An alternative
strategy is the application of a meta-analysis approach,
which combines EC50 estimates obtained from separate
log-logistic model fitting. These two proposed strategies to
summarize EC50 estimates from multiple experiments are
compared in a simulation study and real data example. We
conclude that the meta-analysis strategy is a simple and
robust method to summarize EC50 estimates from multiple
experiments, especially suited in the case of a small number
of experiments.},
keywords = {Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate (NLM Chemicals)},
cin = {C060},
ddc = {570},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C060-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Cancer risk factors and prevention (POF3-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:24478144},
doi = {10.1002/bimj.201300123},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/126072},
}