000126790 001__ 126790
000126790 005__ 20240228140846.0
000126790 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1007/s00204-014-1350-3
000126790 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:25294322
000126790 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0003-9446
000126790 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0340-5761
000126790 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1432-0738
000126790 037__ $$aDKFZ-2017-02818
000126790 041__ $$aeng
000126790 082__ $$a610
000126790 1001_ $$0P:(DE-He78)079436c5442874052d541943e53145ef$$aJiang, Xiaoqi$$b0$$eFirst author$$udkfz
000126790 245__ $$aStatistical strategies for averaging EC50 from multiple dose-response experiments.
000126790 260__ $$aBerlin$$bSpringer$$c2015
000126790 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000126790 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000126790 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1521549885_23660
000126790 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000126790 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000126790 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000126790 520__ $$aIn most dose-response studies, repeated experiments are conducted to determine the EC50 value for a chemical, requiring averaging EC50 estimates from a series of experiments. Two statistical strategies, the mixed-effect modeling and the meta-analysis approach, can be applied to estimate average behavior of EC50 values over all experiments by considering the variabilities within and among experiments. We investigated these two strategies in two common cases of multiple dose-response experiments in (a) complete and explicit dose-response relationships are observed in all experiments and in (b) only in a subset of experiments. In case (a), the meta-analysis strategy is a simple and robust method to average EC50 estimates. In case (b), all experimental data sets can be first screened using the dose-response screening plot, which allows visualization and comparison of multiple dose-response experimental results. As long as more than three experiments provide information about complete dose-response relationships, the experiments that cover incomplete relationships can be excluded from the meta-analysis strategy of averaging EC50 estimates. If there are only two experiments containing complete dose-response information, the mixed-effects model approach is suggested. We subsequently provided a web application for non-statisticians to implement the proposed meta-analysis strategy of averaging EC50 estimates from multiple dose-response experiments.
000126790 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-313$$a313 - Cancer risk factors and prevention (POF3-313)$$cPOF3-313$$fPOF III$$x0
000126790 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed,
000126790 650_7 $$0614OI1Z5WI$$2NLM Chemicals$$aValproic Acid
000126790 7001_ $$0P:(DE-He78)bb6a7a70f976eb8df1769944bf913596$$aKopp-Schneider, Annette$$b1$$eLast author$$udkfz
000126790 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1458459-1$$a10.1007/s00204-014-1350-3$$gVol. 89, no. 11, p. 2119 - 2127$$n11$$p2119 - 2127$$tArchives of toxicology$$v89$$x1432-0738$$y2015
000126790 909CO $$ooai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:126790$$pVDB
000126790 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)2036810-0$$6P:(DE-He78)079436c5442874052d541943e53145ef$$aDeutsches Krebsforschungszentrum$$b0$$kDKFZ
000126790 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)2036810-0$$6P:(DE-He78)bb6a7a70f976eb8df1769944bf913596$$aDeutsches Krebsforschungszentrum$$b1$$kDKFZ
000126790 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-313$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-310$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-300$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bGesundheit$$lKrebsforschung$$vCancer risk factors and prevention$$x0
000126790 9141_ $$y2015
000126790 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz
000126790 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000126790 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000126790 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000126790 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bARCH TOXICOL : 2015
000126790 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search
000126790 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC
000126790 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000126790 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000126790 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000126790 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000126790 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1030$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Life Sciences
000126790 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000126790 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9905$$2StatID$$aIF >= 5$$bARCH TOXICOL : 2015
000126790 9201_ $$0I:(DE-He78)C060-20160331$$kC060$$lBiostatistik$$x0
000126790 980__ $$ajournal
000126790 980__ $$aVDB
000126790 980__ $$aI:(DE-He78)C060-20160331
000126790 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED