% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Kratochwil:126920,
author = {C. Kratochwil$^*$ and M. Stefanova$^*$ and E.
Mavriopoulou$^*$ and T. Holland-Letz$^*$ and A.
Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss$^*$ and A. Afshar-Oromieh$^*$ and W.
Mier$^*$ and U. Haberkorn$^*$ and F. Giesel$^*$},
title = {{SUV} of [68{G}a]{DOTATOC}-{PET}/{CT} {P}redicts {R}esponse
{P}robability of {PRRT} in {N}euroendocrine {T}umors.},
journal = {Molecular imaging $\&$ biology},
volume = {17},
number = {3},
issn = {1860-2002},
address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier Science},
reportid = {DKFZ-2017-02948},
pages = {313 - 318},
year = {2015},
abstract = {The goal of our study was to quantify the expression of the
somatostatin receptors (SSTR2) using the maximum
standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of
[(68)Ga]DOTA(0)-Phe(1)-Tyr(3)-octreotide (DOTATOC) positron
emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography (CT) in liver
metastases of patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs)
prior to peptide receptor radiation therapy (PRRT) and
compare the initial tumor uptake with the final treatment
outcome.SSTR2 expression of the 60 liver metastases in 30
NET patients was assessed at baseline and after PRRT by
measuring SUVmax, tumor to spleen ratio (T/S ratio), and
tumor to liver ratio (T/L ratio). Based on morphological
changes and tumor size measured at baseline and follow-up
contrast-enhanced CT (after three cycles of PRRT), lesions
were divided into two groups by the following: (i)
responding (n = 40) and (ii) non-responding
(n = 20).Statistically significant differences were
observed in the mean SUVmax for non-responding vs.
responding lesions at baseline (18.00 ± 3.59 vs.
33.55 ± 4.62, p < 0.05) and for the mean T/S ratio
(1.20 ± 0.37 vs. 1.90 ± 0.45, p < 0.05) and
the mean T/L ratio (3.15 ± 0.53 vs. 4.97 ± 0.62,
p < 0.05). Using the receiver operating characteristic
curves, SUVmax was found a better metric than both T/L ratio
and T/S ratio (area under the curve (AUC) of SUVmax 0.87;
T/L ratio 0.78; T/S ratio 0.73) as a stratification
criterion. Using a threshold value of >16.4 for SUVmax, the
sensitivity and specificity in predicting responding lesions
were 95 and 60 $\%,$ respectively.We propose a SUVmax cutoff
of >16.4 from [(68)Ga]DOTATOC-PET-CT to select patients for
PRRT. A T/L ratio >2.2 might present a scanner-independent
criterion that enables the translation of our results to
other institutions. However, the robustness of this
arbitrary unit still needs to be evaluated with different
PET scanners.},
keywords = {Contrast Media (NLM Chemicals) / Ga(III)-DOTATOC (NLM
Chemicals) / Organometallic Compounds (NLM Chemicals) /
Peptides (NLM Chemicals) / Radiopharmaceuticals (NLM
Chemicals) / Receptors, Somatostatin (NLM Chemicals) /
somatostatin receptor subtype 2, human (NLM Chemicals) /
Octreotide (NLM Chemicals)},
cin = {E060 / C060},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)E060-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)C060-20160331},
pnm = {315 - Imaging and radiooncology (POF3-315)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-315},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:25319765},
doi = {10.1007/s11307-014-0795-3},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/126920},
}