% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Kuehl:126939,
author = {R. Kuehl$^*$ and F. Scharhag-Rosenberger$^*$ and K.
Schommer and M. Schmidt$^*$ and P. Dreger and G. Huber and
M. Bohus and C. M. Ulrich and J. Wiskemann$^*$},
title = {{E}xercise intensity classification in cancer patients
undergoing allogeneic {HCT}.},
journal = {Medicine and science in sports and exercise},
volume = {47},
number = {5},
issn = {0195-9131},
address = {Philadelphia, Pa.},
publisher = {Lippincott Williams $\&$ Wilkins},
reportid = {DKFZ-2017-02967},
pages = {889 - 895},
year = {2015},
abstract = {Exercise intervention studies during and after cancer
treatment show beneficial effects for various physical and
psychosocial outcomes. Current exercise intensity guidelines
for cancer patients are rather general and have been adapted
from American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM)
recommendations for healthy individuals. Intensive cancer
treatment regimens such as allogeneic hematopoietic stem
cell transplantation (allo-HCT) may change the
cardiovascular response to acute exercise. Therefore, we
evaluated the relationships between $\%V˙O2$ reserve
$(\%V˙O2R,$ reference) and $\%HRR,$ $\%HRmax,$ and
$\%V˙O2max$ and compared calculated intensities with given
intensities by ACSM.Measurements before and 180 d after
allo-HCT from a randomized controlled trial were used. Only
patients who reached maximal effort and at least two
exercise stages in our maximal incremental cycling test were
included. Before allo-HCT, 106 patients were included, and
180 d after treatment, 49 patients met our inclusion
criteria. Individual regression lines were calculated with
V˙O2R as the reference. Calculated exercise intensities for
endurance training prescription were compared with ACSM
values.Before allo-HCT, $\%HRR$ values of patients were
significantly lower than ACSM values, and $\%HRmax$ and
$\%V˙O2max$ values were significantly higher (except $90\%$
HRmax, which was significantly lower, all P < 0.01). One
hundred eighty days after allo-HCT, values for $\%HRR$ were
not significantly different to ACSM values (except $90\%,$
which was significantly lower, P = 0.01), whereas $\%HRmax$
and $\%V˙O2max$ were significantly higher (all P < 0.05).
Furthermore, regression models revealed no influence of
beta-blockers on calculated intensities.ACSM's exercise
intensity recommendations for endurance training may not be
applicable for cancer patients during and 180 d after
allo-HCT because they may not meet the targeted intensity
class, with the exception of $\%HRR$ 180 d after allo-HCT.},
cin = {G110 / D120 / G111},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)G110-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)D120-20160331 /
I:(DE-He78)G111-20160331},
pnm = {317 - Translational cancer research (POF3-317)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-317},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:25202849},
doi = {10.1249/MSS.0000000000000498},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/126939},
}