000127365 001__ 127365
000127365 005__ 20240228140922.0
000127365 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1007/s10554-015-0604-3
000127365 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:25645544
000127365 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0167-9899
000127365 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1569-5794
000127365 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1573-0743
000127365 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1875-8312
000127365 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:3315404
000127365 037__ $$aDKFZ-2017-03390
000127365 041__ $$aeng
000127365 082__ $$a610
000127365 1001_ $$0P:(DE-He78)a57933a3eb4602082b47da6451b97e97$$aRengier, Fabian$$b0$$eFirst author$$udkfz
000127365 245__ $$aNoninvasive 4D pressure difference mapping derived from 4D flow MRI in patients with repaired aortic coarctation: comparison with young healthy volunteers.
000127365 260__ $$aDordrecht [u.a.]$$bSpringer$$c2015
000127365 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000127365 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000127365 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1522765870_2955
000127365 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000127365 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000127365 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000127365 520__ $$aTo assess spatial and temporal pressure characteristics in patients with repaired aortic coarctation compared to young healthy volunteers using time-resolved velocity-encoded three-dimensional phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (4D flow MRI) and derived 4D pressure difference maps. After in vitro validation against invasive catheterization as gold standard, 4D flow MRI of the thoracic aorta was performed at 1.5T in 13 consecutive patients after aortic coarctation repair without recoarctation and 13 healthy volunteers. Using in-house developed processing software, 4D pressure difference maps were computed based on the Navier-Stokes equation. Pressure difference amplitudes, maximum slope of pressure amplitudes and spatial pressure range at mid systole were retrospectively measured by three readers, and twice by one reader to assess inter- and intraobserver agreement. In vitro, pressure differences derived from 4D flow MRI showed excellent agreement to invasive catheter measurements. In vivo, pressure difference amplitudes, maximum slope of pressure difference amplitudes and spatial pressure range at mid systole were significantly increased in patients compared to volunteers in the aortic arch, the proximal descending and the distal descending thoracic aorta (p < 0.05). Greatest differences occurred in the proximal descending aorta with values of the three parameters for patients versus volunteers being 19.7 ± 7.5 versus 10.0 ± 2.0 (p < 0.001), 10.9 ± 10.4 versus 1.9 ± 0.4 (p = 0.002), and 8.7 ± 6.3 versus 1.6 ± 0.9 (p < 0.001). Inter- and intraobserver agreements were excellent (p < 0.001). Noninvasive 4D pressure difference mapping derived from 4D flow MRI enables detection of altered intraluminal aortic pressures and showed significant spatial and temporal changes in patients with repaired aortic coarctation.
000127365 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-315$$a315 - Imaging and radiooncology (POF3-315)$$cPOF3-315$$fPOF III$$x0
000127365 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed,
000127365 7001_ $$aDelles, Michael$$b1
000127365 7001_ $$aEichhorn, Joachim$$b2
000127365 7001_ $$aAzad, Yoo-Jin$$b3
000127365 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$avon Tengg-Kobligk, Hendrik$$b4
000127365 7001_ $$aLey-Zaporozhan, Julia$$b5
000127365 7001_ $$aDillmann, Rüdiger$$b6
000127365 7001_ $$0P:(DE-He78)cdb6ba5e925fa050ebfa816181cf5769$$aKauczor, Hans-Ulrich$$b7$$udkfz
000127365 7001_ $$aUnterhinninghofen, Roland$$b8
000127365 7001_ $$aLey, Sebastian$$b9
000127365 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2008950-8$$a10.1007/s10554-015-0604-3$$gVol. 31, no. 4, p. 823 - 830$$n4$$p823 - 830$$tThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging$$v31$$x1573-0743$$y2015
000127365 909CO $$ooai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:127365$$pVDB
000127365 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)2036810-0$$6P:(DE-He78)a57933a3eb4602082b47da6451b97e97$$aDeutsches Krebsforschungszentrum$$b0$$kDKFZ
000127365 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)2036810-0$$6P:(DE-HGF)0$$aDeutsches Krebsforschungszentrum$$b4$$kDKFZ
000127365 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)2036810-0$$6P:(DE-He78)cdb6ba5e925fa050ebfa816181cf5769$$aDeutsches Krebsforschungszentrum$$b7$$kDKFZ
000127365 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-315$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-310$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-300$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bGesundheit$$lKrebsforschung$$vImaging and radiooncology$$x0
000127365 9141_ $$y2015
000127365 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz
000127365 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000127365 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000127365 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bINT J CARDIOVAS IMAG : 2015
000127365 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000127365 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000127365 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000127365 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000127365 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1110$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Clinical Medicine
000127365 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000127365 9201_ $$0I:(DE-He78)E010-20160331$$kE010$$lRadiologie$$x0
000127365 9201_ $$0I:(DE-He78)E015-20160331$$kE015$$lPopulation Imaging$$x1
000127365 980__ $$ajournal
000127365 980__ $$aVDB
000127365 980__ $$aI:(DE-He78)E010-20160331
000127365 980__ $$aI:(DE-He78)E015-20160331
000127365 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED