% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Rengier:127365,
author = {F. Rengier$^*$ and M. Delles and J. Eichhorn and Y.-J. Azad
and H. von Tengg-Kobligk$^*$ and J. Ley-Zaporozhan and R.
Dillmann and H.-U. Kauczor$^*$ and R. Unterhinninghofen and
S. Ley},
title = {{N}oninvasive 4{D} pressure difference mapping derived from
4{D} flow {MRI} in patients with repaired aortic
coarctation: comparison with young healthy volunteers.},
journal = {The international journal of cardiovascular imaging},
volume = {31},
number = {4},
issn = {1573-0743},
address = {Dordrecht [u.a.]},
publisher = {Springer},
reportid = {DKFZ-2017-03390},
pages = {823 - 830},
year = {2015},
abstract = {To assess spatial and temporal pressure characteristics in
patients with repaired aortic coarctation compared to young
healthy volunteers using time-resolved velocity-encoded
three-dimensional phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging
(4D flow MRI) and derived 4D pressure difference maps. After
in vitro validation against invasive catheterization as gold
standard, 4D flow MRI of the thoracic aorta was performed at
1.5T in 13 consecutive patients after aortic coarctation
repair without recoarctation and 13 healthy volunteers.
Using in-house developed processing software, 4D pressure
difference maps were computed based on the Navier-Stokes
equation. Pressure difference amplitudes, maximum slope of
pressure amplitudes and spatial pressure range at mid
systole were retrospectively measured by three readers, and
twice by one reader to assess inter- and intraobserver
agreement. In vitro, pressure differences derived from 4D
flow MRI showed excellent agreement to invasive catheter
measurements. In vivo, pressure difference amplitudes,
maximum slope of pressure difference amplitudes and spatial
pressure range at mid systole were significantly increased
in patients compared to volunteers in the aortic arch, the
proximal descending and the distal descending thoracic aorta
(p < 0.05). Greatest differences occurred in the proximal
descending aorta with values of the three parameters for
patients versus volunteers being 19.7 ± 7.5 versus 10.0 ±
2.0 (p < 0.001), 10.9 ± 10.4 versus 1.9 ± 0.4 (p = 0.002),
and 8.7 ± 6.3 versus 1.6 ± 0.9 (p < 0.001). Inter- and
intraobserver agreements were excellent (p < 0.001).
Noninvasive 4D pressure difference mapping derived from 4D
flow MRI enables detection of altered intraluminal aortic
pressures and showed significant spatial and temporal
changes in patients with repaired aortic coarctation.},
cin = {E010 / E015},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)E010-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)E015-20160331},
pnm = {315 - Imaging and radiooncology (POF3-315)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-315},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:25645544},
doi = {10.1007/s10554-015-0604-3},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/127365},
}