% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Safi:127430,
author = {S. Safi and A. Benner$^*$ and J. Walloschek and M.
Renner$^*$ and J. op den Winkel and T. Muley and K. Storz
and H. Dienemann and H. Hoffmann and T. Schneider},
title = {{D}evelopment and validation of a risk score for predicting
death after pneumonectomy.},
journal = {PLoS one},
volume = {10},
number = {4},
issn = {1932-6203},
address = {Lawrence, Kan.},
publisher = {PLoS},
reportid = {DKFZ-2017-03453},
pages = {e0121295 -},
year = {2015},
abstract = {Pneumonectomy is associated with significant postoperative
mortality. This study was undertaken to develop and validate
a risk model of mortality following pneumonectomy. We
reviewed our prospective database and identified 774
pneumonectomies from a total of 7792 consecutive anatomical
lung resections in the years 2003 to 2010 (rate of
pneumonectomy: $9.9\%).$ Based on data from 542
pneumonectomies between 2003 and 2007 (i.e., the 'discovery
set'), a penalized multivariable logistic regression
analysis was performed to identify preoperative risk
factors. A risk model was developed and validated in an
independent data set of 232 pneumonectomies that were
performed between 2008 and 2010 (i.e., the 'validation
set'). Of the 542 patients in the discovery set (DS), 35
patients $(6.5\%)$ died after pneumonectomy during the same
admission. We developed a risk prediction model for
in-hospital mortality following pneumonectomy; that model
included age, current alcohol use, coronary artery disease,
preoperative leukocyte count and palliative indication as
possible risk factors. The risk model was subsequently
successfully validated in an independent data set (n = 232)
in which 18 patients $(7.8\%)$ died following pneumonectomy.
For the validation set, the sensitivity of the model was
$53.3\%$ (DS: $54.3\%),$ the specificity was $88.0\%$ (DS:
$87.4\%),$ the positive predictive value was $26.7\%$ (DS:
$22.9\%)$ and the negative predictive value was $95.8\%$
(DS: $96.5\%).$ The Brier score was 0.062 (DS: 0.054). The
prediction model is statistically valid and clinically
relevant.},
cin = {C060},
ddc = {500},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C060-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Cancer risk factors and prevention (POF3-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:25856315},
pmc = {pmc:PMC4391778},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0121295},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/127430},
}