Home > Publications database > Efficacy and toxicity of chemoradiation in patients with anal cancer--a retrospective analysis. > print |
001 | 127604 | ||
005 | 20240228135030.0 | ||
024 | 7 | _ | |a 10.1186/1748-717X-9-113 |2 doi |
024 | 7 | _ | |a pmid:24886574 |2 pmid |
024 | 7 | _ | |a pmc:PMC4030022 |2 pmc |
024 | 7 | _ | |a altmetric:2349471 |2 altmetric |
037 | _ | _ | |a DKFZ-2017-03627 |
041 | _ | _ | |a eng |
082 | _ | _ | |a 610 |
100 | 1 | _ | |a Koerber, Stefan Alexander |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 0 |e First author |
245 | _ | _ | |a Efficacy and toxicity of chemoradiation in patients with anal cancer--a retrospective analysis. |
260 | _ | _ | |a London |c 2014 |b BioMed Central |
336 | 7 | _ | |a article |2 DRIVER |
336 | 7 | _ | |a Output Types/Journal article |2 DataCite |
336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |b journal |m journal |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16 |s 1506584694_13931 |2 PUB:(DE-HGF) |
336 | 7 | _ | |a ARTICLE |2 BibTeX |
336 | 7 | _ | |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE |2 ORCID |
336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |0 0 |2 EndNote |
520 | _ | _ | |a Concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy is the preferred standard of care for patients with anal cancer. Several studies have suggested a benefit of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) compared with 3D-conformal radiation (3D-CRT) regarding acute toxicity. This study evaluates outcome and toxicity of patients undergoing IMRT/Tomotherapy or 3D-CRT at our institution.A cohort of 105 anal cancer patients was treated with chemoradiation or radiation alone (16.2%) between January 2000 and December 2011. 37 patients received 3D-CRT while 68 patients were treated with IMRT. Follow-up exams were performed every 3 to 6 months for a minimum of 3 years and then annually.Median follow-up was 41.4 months (2.8 - 158.4). Overall survival (OS), Progression-free survival (PFS) and local control (LC) at 3 years was 70.3%, 66.5%, 78.3% in the 3D-CRT group and 82.9%, 66.5%, 75.3% in the IMRT group without statistically significant difference. 3-year Colostomy-free survival (CFS) was 85.7% in the IMRT/Tomotherapy group and 91.8% in the 3D-CRT group (p = 0.48). No grade 4 toxicity was found in both groups. Severe (G2/3) acute skin toxicity (94.6% vs. 63.2%; p < 0.001) and acute gastrointestinal toxicity rate (67.6% vs. 47.1%; p = 0.03) was significantly higher with 3D-CRT compared to IMRT/Tomotherapy.The use of IMRT can reduce acute severe side effects of the skin and gastrointestinal tract but did not demonstrate improved results regarding OS, PFS, LC and CFS. |
536 | _ | _ | |a 315 - Imaging and radiooncology (POF3-315) |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-315 |c POF3-315 |f POF III |x 0 |
588 | _ | _ | |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Slynko, Alla |0 P:(DE-He78)4169c43af2de6fae487c89fc2e7cfaa8 |b 1 |u dkfz |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Haefner, Matthias F |b 2 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Krug, David |b 3 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Schoneweg, Clara |b 4 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Kessel, Kerstin |b 5 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Kopp-Schneider, Annette |0 P:(DE-He78)bb6a7a70f976eb8df1769944bf913596 |b 6 |u dkfz |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Herfarth, Klaus |b 7 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Debus, Juergen |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 8 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Sterzing, Florian |0 P:(DE-He78)75d45845a04db67c5a88db1086046ef1 |b 9 |e Last author |u dkfz |
773 | _ | _ | |a 10.1186/1748-717X-9-113 |g Vol. 9, no. 1, p. 113 - |0 PERI:(DE-600)2224965-5 |n 1 |p 113 |t Radiation oncology |v 9 |y 2014 |x 1748-717X |
909 | C | O | |o oai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:127604 |p VDB |
910 | 1 | _ | |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum |0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0 |k DKFZ |b 0 |6 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
910 | 1 | _ | |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum |0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0 |k DKFZ |b 1 |6 P:(DE-He78)4169c43af2de6fae487c89fc2e7cfaa8 |
910 | 1 | _ | |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum |0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0 |k DKFZ |b 6 |6 P:(DE-He78)bb6a7a70f976eb8df1769944bf913596 |
910 | 1 | _ | |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum |0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0 |k DKFZ |b 8 |6 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
910 | 1 | _ | |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum |0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0 |k DKFZ |b 9 |6 P:(DE-He78)75d45845a04db67c5a88db1086046ef1 |
913 | 1 | _ | |a DE-HGF |l Krebsforschung |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-310 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-315 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-300 |v Imaging and radiooncology |x 0 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3 |b Gesundheit |
914 | 1 | _ | |y 2014 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200 |2 StatID |b SCOPUS |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300 |2 StatID |b Medline |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310 |2 StatID |b NCBI Molecular Biology Database |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501 |2 StatID |b DOAJ Seal |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500 |2 StatID |b DOAJ |
915 | _ | _ | |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY (No Version) |0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNV |2 V:(DE-HGF) |b DOAJ |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600 |2 StatID |b Ebsco Academic Search |
915 | _ | _ | |a Peer Review |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030 |2 StatID |b ASC |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199 |2 StatID |b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List |
915 | _ | _ | |a WoS |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111 |2 StatID |b Science Citation Index Expanded |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150 |2 StatID |b Web of Science Core Collection |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1110 |2 StatID |b Current Contents - Clinical Medicine |
920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-He78)C060-20160331 |k C060 |l Biostatistik |x 0 |
920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-He78)E050-20160331 |k E050 |l KKE Strahlentherapie |x 1 |
980 | _ | _ | |a journal |
980 | _ | _ | |a VDB |
980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-He78)C060-20160331 |
980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-He78)E050-20160331 |
980 | _ | _ | |a UNRESTRICTED |
Library | Collection | CLSMajor | CLSMinor | Language | Author |
---|