000127788 001__ 127788
000127788 005__ 20240228140949.0
000127788 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.01.025
000127788 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:25740701
000127788 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0720-048X
000127788 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1872-7727
000127788 037__ $$aDKFZ-2017-03810
000127788 041__ $$aeng
000127788 082__ $$a610
000127788 1001_ $$0P:(DE-He78)40da88c1e07a6ce8bf1d138b6215471f$$aWielpütz, Mark Oliver$$b0$$eFirst author$$udkfz
000127788 245__ $$aComputer-aided detection of artificial pulmonary nodules using an ex vivo lung phantom: influence of exposure parameters and iterative reconstruction.
000127788 260__ $$aAmsterdam [u.a.]$$bElsevier Science$$c2015
000127788 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000127788 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000127788 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1524142752_24105
000127788 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000127788 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000127788 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000127788 520__ $$aTo evaluate the influence of exposure parameters and raw-data based iterative reconstruction (IR) on the performance of computer-aided detection (CAD) of pulmonary nodules on chest multidetector computed tomography (MDCT).Seven porcine lung explants were inflated in a dedicated ex vivo phantom shell and prepared with n=162 artificial nodules of a clinically relevant volume and maximum diameter (46-1063 μl, and 6.2-21.5 mm). n=118 nodules were solid and n=44 part-solid. MDCT was performed with different combinations of 120 and 80 kV with 120, 60, 30 and 12 mA*s, and reconstructed with both filtered back projection (FBP) and IR. Subsequently, 16 datasets per lung were subjected to dedicated CAD software. The rate of true positive, false negative and false positive CAD marks was measured for each reconstruction.The rate of true positive findings ranged between 88.9-91.4% for FBP and 88.3-90.1% for IR (n.s.) with most exposure settings, but was significantly lower with the combination of 80 kV and 12 mA*s (80.9% and 81.5%, respectively, p<0.05). False positive findings ranged between 2.3-8.1 annotations per lung. For nodule volumes <200 μl the rate of true positives was significantly lower than for >300 μl (p<0.05). Similarly, it was significantly lower for diameters <12 mm compared to ≥12 mm (p<0.05). The rate of true positives for solid and part-solid nodules was similar.Nodule CAD on chest MDCT is robust over a wide range of exposure settings. Noise reduction by IR is not detrimental for CAD, and may be used to improve image quality in the setting of low-dose MDCT for lung cancer screening.
000127788 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-315$$a315 - Imaging and radiooncology (POF3-315)$$cPOF3-315$$fPOF III$$x0
000127788 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed,
000127788 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aWroblewski, Jacek$$b1
000127788 7001_ $$aLederlin, Mathieu$$b2
000127788 7001_ $$aDinkel, Julien$$b3
000127788 7001_ $$aEichinger, Monika$$b4
000127788 7001_ $$aKoenigkam-Santos, M.$$b5
000127788 7001_ $$0P:(DE-He78)09875ba4d79c705ab2086706cef963d5$$aBiederer, Jürgen$$b6$$udkfz
000127788 7001_ $$0P:(DE-He78)cdb6ba5e925fa050ebfa816181cf5769$$aKauczor, Hans-Ulrich$$b7$$udkfz
000127788 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aPuderbach, Michael U$$b8
000127788 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aJobst, Bertram J$$b9$$eLast author
000127788 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2005350-2$$a10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.01.025$$gVol. 84, no. 5, p. 1005 - 1011$$n5$$p1005 - 1011$$tEuropean journal of radiology$$v84$$x0720-048X$$y2015
000127788 909CO $$ooai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:127788$$pVDB
000127788 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)2036810-0$$6P:(DE-He78)40da88c1e07a6ce8bf1d138b6215471f$$aDeutsches Krebsforschungszentrum$$b0$$kDKFZ
000127788 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)2036810-0$$6P:(DE-HGF)0$$aDeutsches Krebsforschungszentrum$$b1$$kDKFZ
000127788 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)2036810-0$$6P:(DE-He78)09875ba4d79c705ab2086706cef963d5$$aDeutsches Krebsforschungszentrum$$b6$$kDKFZ
000127788 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)2036810-0$$6P:(DE-He78)cdb6ba5e925fa050ebfa816181cf5769$$aDeutsches Krebsforschungszentrum$$b7$$kDKFZ
000127788 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)2036810-0$$6P:(DE-HGF)0$$aDeutsches Krebsforschungszentrum$$b8$$kDKFZ
000127788 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)2036810-0$$6P:(DE-HGF)0$$aDeutsches Krebsforschungszentrum$$b9$$kDKFZ
000127788 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-315$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-310$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-300$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bGesundheit$$lKrebsforschung$$vImaging and radiooncology$$x0
000127788 9141_ $$y2015
000127788 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz
000127788 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bEUR J RADIOL : 2015
000127788 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000127788 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000127788 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search
000127788 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC
000127788 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000127788 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000127788 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000127788 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1110$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Clinical Medicine
000127788 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000127788 9201_ $$0I:(DE-He78)E010-20160331$$kE010$$lRadiologie$$x0
000127788 9201_ $$0I:(DE-He78)E015-20160331$$kE015$$lPopulation Imaging$$x1
000127788 980__ $$ajournal
000127788 980__ $$aVDB
000127788 980__ $$aI:(DE-He78)E010-20160331
000127788 980__ $$aI:(DE-He78)E015-20160331
000127788 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED