001     127788
005     20240228140949.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.01.025
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a pmid:25740701
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a 0720-048X
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1872-7727
|2 ISSN
037 _ _ |a DKFZ-2017-03810
041 _ _ |a eng
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Wielpütz, Mark Oliver
|0 P:(DE-He78)40da88c1e07a6ce8bf1d138b6215471f
|b 0
|e First author
|u dkfz
245 _ _ |a Computer-aided detection of artificial pulmonary nodules using an ex vivo lung phantom: influence of exposure parameters and iterative reconstruction.
260 _ _ |a Amsterdam [u.a.]
|c 2015
|b Elsevier Science
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1524142752_24105
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a To evaluate the influence of exposure parameters and raw-data based iterative reconstruction (IR) on the performance of computer-aided detection (CAD) of pulmonary nodules on chest multidetector computed tomography (MDCT).Seven porcine lung explants were inflated in a dedicated ex vivo phantom shell and prepared with n=162 artificial nodules of a clinically relevant volume and maximum diameter (46-1063 μl, and 6.2-21.5 mm). n=118 nodules were solid and n=44 part-solid. MDCT was performed with different combinations of 120 and 80 kV with 120, 60, 30 and 12 mA*s, and reconstructed with both filtered back projection (FBP) and IR. Subsequently, 16 datasets per lung were subjected to dedicated CAD software. The rate of true positive, false negative and false positive CAD marks was measured for each reconstruction.The rate of true positive findings ranged between 88.9-91.4% for FBP and 88.3-90.1% for IR (n.s.) with most exposure settings, but was significantly lower with the combination of 80 kV and 12 mA*s (80.9% and 81.5%, respectively, p<0.05). False positive findings ranged between 2.3-8.1 annotations per lung. For nodule volumes <200 μl the rate of true positives was significantly lower than for >300 μl (p<0.05). Similarly, it was significantly lower for diameters <12 mm compared to ≥12 mm (p<0.05). The rate of true positives for solid and part-solid nodules was similar.Nodule CAD on chest MDCT is robust over a wide range of exposure settings. Noise reduction by IR is not detrimental for CAD, and may be used to improve image quality in the setting of low-dose MDCT for lung cancer screening.
536 _ _ |a 315 - Imaging and radiooncology (POF3-315)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-315
|c POF3-315
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed,
700 1 _ |a Wroblewski, Jacek
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Lederlin, Mathieu
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Dinkel, Julien
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Eichinger, Monika
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Koenigkam-Santos, M.
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Biederer, Jürgen
|0 P:(DE-He78)09875ba4d79c705ab2086706cef963d5
|b 6
|u dkfz
700 1 _ |a Kauczor, Hans-Ulrich
|0 P:(DE-He78)cdb6ba5e925fa050ebfa816181cf5769
|b 7
|u dkfz
700 1 _ |a Puderbach, Michael U
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 8
700 1 _ |a Jobst, Bertram J
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 9
|e Last author
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.01.025
|g Vol. 84, no. 5, p. 1005 - 1011
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2005350-2
|n 5
|p 1005 - 1011
|t European journal of radiology
|v 84
|y 2015
|x 0720-048X
909 C O |o oai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:127788
|p VDB
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-He78)40da88c1e07a6ce8bf1d138b6215471f
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 6
|6 P:(DE-He78)09875ba4d79c705ab2086706cef963d5
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 7
|6 P:(DE-He78)cdb6ba5e925fa050ebfa816181cf5769
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 8
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 9
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|l Krebsforschung
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-310
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-315
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-300
|v Imaging and radiooncology
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|b Gesundheit
914 1 _ |y 2015
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b EUR J RADIOL : 2015
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1110
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Clinical Medicine
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)E010-20160331
|k E010
|l Radiologie
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)E015-20160331
|k E015
|l Population Imaging
|x 1
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)E010-20160331
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)E015-20160331
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21