% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Labsch:127875,
author = {S. Labsch$^*$ and L. Liu$^*$ and N. Bauer$^*$ and Y.
Zhang$^*$ and E. Aleksandrowicz$^*$ and J. Gladkich$^*$ and
F. Schönsiegel$^*$ and I. Herr$^*$},
title = {{S}ulforaphane and {TRAIL} induce a synergistic elimination
of advanced prostate cancer stem-like cells.},
journal = {International journal of oncology},
volume = {44},
number = {5},
issn = {1791-2423},
address = {Athens},
publisher = {Spandidos Publ.},
reportid = {DKFZ-2017-03897},
pages = {1470 - 1480},
year = {2014},
abstract = {Advanced androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC) is an
aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis.
Apoptosis-resistant cancer stem cells (CSCs) have been
identified in AIPC and are not eliminated by current
therapeutics. Novel therapeutic options, which are currently
being evaluated in patient studies, include TRAIL and the
broccoli-derived isothiocyanate sulforaphane. Although
neither agent targets normal cells, TRAIL induces apoptosis
in most cancer cells, and sulforaphane eliminates CSCs. In
this study, the established AIPC cell lines DU145 and PC3,
with enriched CSC features, and primary patient-derived
prostate CSCs were treated with sulforaphane and recombinant
soluble TRAIL. We examined the effects of these drugs on
NF-κB activity, self-renewal and differentiation potential,
and stem cell signaling via spheroid- and colony-forming
assays, FACS and western blot analyses,
immunohistochemistry, and an antibody protein array in vitro
and after xenotransplantation. We largely found a stronger
effect of sulforaphane on CSC properties compared to TRAIL,
though the agents acted synergistically when applied in
combination. This was associated with the inhibition of
TRAIL-induced NF-κB binding; CXCR4, Jagged1, Notch 1, SOX
2, and Nanog expression; ALDH1 activity inhibition; and the
elimination of differentiation and self-renewal potential.
In vivo, tumor engraftment and tumor growth were strongly
inhibited, without the induction of liver necrosis or other
obvious side effects. These findings suggest that
sulforaphane shifts the balance from TRAIL-induced survival
signals to apoptosis and thus explains the observed
synergistic effect. A nutritional strategy for high
sulforaphane intake may target the cancer-specific activity
of TRAIL in CSCs.},
keywords = {Antineoplastic Agents (NLM Chemicals) / Isothiocyanates
(NLM Chemicals) / TNF-Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligand (NLM
Chemicals) / Protein-Serine-Threonine Kinases (NLM
Chemicals) / NF-kappa B kinase (NLM Chemicals) / sulforafan
(NLM Chemicals)},
cin = {G403},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)G403-20160331},
pnm = {317 - Translational cancer research (POF3-317)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-317},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:24626333},
pmc = {pmc:PMC4027950},
doi = {10.3892/ijo.2014.2335},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/127875},
}