% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Madhavan:128027,
author = {D. Madhavan and M. Wallwiener and K. Bents and M.
Zucknick$^*$ and J. Nees and S. Schott and K. Cuk and S.
Riethdorf and A. Trumpp$^*$ and K. Pantel and C. Sohn and A.
Schneeweiss and H. Surowy$^*$ and B. Burwinkel$^*$},
title = {{P}lasma {DNA} integrity as a biomarker for primary and
metastatic breast cancer and potential marker for early
diagnosis.060},
journal = {Breast cancer research and treatment},
volume = {146},
number = {1},
issn = {1573-7217},
address = {Dordrecht [u.a.]},
publisher = {Springer Science + Business Media B.V.},
reportid = {DKFZ-2017-04049},
pages = {163 - 174},
year = {2014},
abstract = {Circulating or cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has been evaluated as
a biomarker in many cancers including breast cancer. In
particular, integrity of cfDNA has been shown to be altered
in cancers. We have estimated the biomarker potential of
cfDNA in primary (PBC) and metastatic breast cancer (MBC).
cfDNA integrity (cfDI) and concentration were determined in
plasma of 383 individuals, including 82 PBC and 201 MBC
cases, as well as 100 healthy controls, by measuring ALU and
LINE1 repetitive DNA elements using quantitative PCR. The
MBC patient group was further sub-divided into patients with
detectable circulating tumour cells (CTCpos-MBC, n = 100)
and those without (CTCneg-MBC, n = 101). A hierarchical
decrease in cfDI and increase in cfDNA concentration from
healthy controls to PBC and further onto MBC patients were
observed. Investigation of cfDNA in media of cell lines was
in concordance with these results. Combination of cfDI and
cfDNA concentration could differentiate PBC cases from
controls (area under the curve, AUC = 0.75), MBC cases
from controls (AUC = 0.81 for CTCneg-MBC, AUC = 0.93 for
CTCpos-MBC), and CTCneg-MBC from CTCpos-MBC cases
(AUC = 0.83). cfDI additionally demonstrated a positive
correlation to progression-free (HR of 0.46 for ALU,
P = 0.0025) and overall survival (HR of 0.15 for ALU and
0.20 for LINE1, P < 0.0001) in MBC, and had lower
prediction error than CTC status. Our findings show that
reduced cfDI and increased cfDNA concentration can serve as
diagnostic markers for PBC and MBC, and cfDI as a prognostic
marker for MBC, thereby making them attractive candidates
for blood-based multi-marker assays.},
keywords = {Biomarkers, Tumor (NLM Chemicals)},
cin = {C060 / C080 / A010},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C060-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)C080-20160331 /
I:(DE-He78)A010-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Cancer risk factors and prevention (POF3-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:24838941},
doi = {10.1007/s10549-014-2946-2},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/128027},
}