% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Bickelhaupt:128310,
author = {S. Bickelhaupt$^*$ and D. Paech$^*$ and F. Laun$^*$ and F.
Steudle$^*$ and T. A. Kuder$^*$ and A. Mlynarska$^*$ and M.
Bach$^*$ and W. Lederer and S. Teiner and S. Schneider and
M. Ladd$^*$ and H. Daniel and A. Stieber and A.
Kopp-Schneider$^*$ and S. Delorme$^*$ and H.-P.
Schlemmer$^*$},
title = {{M}aximum intensity breast diffusion {MRI} for {BI}-{RADS}
4 lesions detected on {X}-ray mammography.},
journal = {Clinical radiology},
volume = {72},
number = {10},
issn = {0009-9260},
address = {Amsterdam},
publisher = {Elsevier Science},
reportid = {DKFZ-2017-04327},
pages = {900.e1 - 900.e8},
year = {2017},
abstract = {To investigate an abbreviated, contrast-agent free
diffusion-weighted (DW) breast magnetic resonance imaging
(MRI) protocol that provides a single image for the
radiologist to read in order to non-invasively examine
Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4 lesions
detected using breast cancer screening X-ray
mammography.This retrospective evaluation within a
institutional review board-approved, prospective study
included 115 women (mean 57 years, range 50-69 years) with
BI-RADS 4 findings on X-ray mammography and indication for
biopsy over a period of 15 months. Full diagnostic breast
MRI (FDP) was performed prior to biopsy (1.5 T). Maximum
intensity breast diffusion (MIBD) images were generated from
DW images (b = 1,500 mm/s(2), 3 mm section thickness) of
the breast. MIBD and T2-weighted (T2W) images were read by
two radiologists and compared to the diagnostic accuracy of
an expert reading of the FDP with histopathology as the
reference standard. The acquisition time of MIBD and T2W MRI
was about 7 minutes.MIBD MRI provided a diagnostic accuracy
of $87.93\%$ $(95\%$ confidence interval [CI]:
$80.58-93.24\%)$ for R1 and $89.66\%$ $(95\%$ CI:
$82.63-94.54\%)$ for R2. Expert reading of the FDP revealed
a similar accuracy of $86.2\%$ $(95\%$ CI: $78.67-91.43\%).$
The positive predictive value (PPV) could be increased from
$36.2\%$ $(95\%$ CI: 28.02-45.28; X-ray mammography alone)
to a mean PPV of $80.89\%$ (R1 $79.17\%,$ R2 $82.16\%)$
using MIBD MRI. Mean reading time was 30 seconds $(25\%/75$
percentile 24.5-41.25).MIBD MRI might be of supplemental
value if added to the work-up of BI-RADS 4 X-ray mammography
screening findings. MIBD MRI might help reduce the
false-positive rate prior to biopsy for reference lesions at
only limited expense of measurement and reading time.},
cin = {E010 / E020 / C060},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)E010-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)E020-20160331 /
I:(DE-He78)C060-20160331},
pnm = {315 - Imaging and radiooncology (POF3-315)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-315},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:28687167},
doi = {10.1016/j.crad.2017.05.017},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/128310},
}