% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Telsemeyer:128418,
author = {J. Telsemeyer$^*$ and B. Ackermann and S. Ecker and O.
Jäkel$^*$ and M. Martisikova$^*$},
title = {{E}xperimental verification of ion range calculation in a
treatment planning system using a flat-panel detector.},
journal = {Physics in medicine and biology},
volume = {59},
number = {14},
issn = {1361-6560},
address = {Bristol},
publisher = {IOP Publ.},
reportid = {DKFZ-2017-04434},
pages = {3737 - 3747},
year = {2014},
abstract = {Heavy ion-beam therapy is a highly precise radiation
therapy exploiting the characteristic interaction of ions
with matter. The steep dose gradient of the Bragg curve
allows the irradiation of targets with high-dose and a
narrow dose penumbra around the target, in contrast to
photon irradiation. This, however, makes heavy ion-beam
therapy very sensitive to minor changes in the range
calculation of the treatment planning system, as it has a
direct influence on the outcome of the treatment. Our
previous study has shown that ion radiography with an
amorphous silicon flat-panel detector allows the measurement
of the water equivalent thickness (WET) of an imaging object
with good accuracy and high spatial resolution. In this
study, the developed imaging technique is used to measure
the WET distribution of a patient-like phantom, and these
results are compared to the WET calculation of the treatment
planning system. To do so, a measured two-dimensional map of
the WET of an anthropomorphic phantom was compared to WET
distributions based on x-ray computed tomography images as
used in the treatment planning system. It was found that the
WET maps agree well in the overall shape and two-dimensional
distribution of WET values. Quantitatively, the ratio of the
two-dimensional WET maps shows a mean of 1.004 with a
standard deviation of 0.022. Differences were found to be
concentrated at high WET gradients. This could be explained
by the Bragg-peak degradation, which is measured in detail
by ion radiography with the flat-panel detector, but is not
taken into account in the treatment planning system.
Excluding pixels exhibiting significant Bragg-peak
degradation, the mean value of the ratio was found to be
1.000 with a standard deviation of 0.012. Employment of the
amorphous silicon flat-panel detector for WET measurements
allows us to detect uncertainties of the WET determination
in the treatment planning process. This makes the
investigated technique a very helpful tool to study the WET
determination of critical and complex phantom cases.},
keywords = {Silicon (NLM Chemicals)},
cin = {E040},
ddc = {570},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)E040-20160331},
pnm = {315 - Imaging and radiooncology (POF3-315)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-315},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:24936855},
doi = {10.1088/0031-9155/59/14/3737},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/128418},
}