000128721 001__ 128721
000128721 005__ 20240228143344.0
000128721 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1007/s00345-015-1594-4
000128721 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:25991601
000128721 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0724-4983
000128721 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1433-8726
000128721 037__ $$aDKFZ-2017-04736
000128721 041__ $$aeng
000128721 082__ $$a610
000128721 1001_ $$aHatiboglu, G.$$b0
000128721 245__ $$aPredictive factors for immediate continence after radical prostatectomy.
000128721 260__ $$aBerlin$$bSpringer$$c2016
000128721 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000128721 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000128721 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1522055221_26909
000128721 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000128721 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000128721 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000128721 520__ $$aTo identify predictive factors for immediate continence after radical prostatectomy.A total of 1553 patients underwent radical prostatectomy in a single institution (670 RRP, 883 RARP), had complete perioperative data and follow-up for urinary continence and were included in this prospective analysis. Immediate continence was defined as no pad usage after catheter removal. Evaluated parameters included age, body mass index, ECOG performance status, erectile function, prostate volume, PSA, Gleason score, tumor stage and D'Amico risk groups, as well as surgical approach (RRP, RARP), surgeon volume, nerve-sparing, lymphadenectomy, blood transfusions and duration of catheterization.A total of 240 men (15.5 %) did not require any pads 1 day or later after removal of the transurethral catheter. Correlation of parameters with immediate continence revealed significance for age (p < 0.001), ECOG-score (p = 0.025), erectile function (p = 0.001), nerve-sparing (p = 0.022), Gleason score (p = 0.002) and surgeon volume (p ≤ 0.022). Multivariate analyses identified IIEF-score >21 (p = 0.031), ECOG (p < 0.05), bilateral nerve-sparing (p = 0.049), Gleason score <3 + 4 (p ≤ 0.028), less blood transfusion (p ≤ 0.044) and surgeon volume (p ≤ 0.042) as the remaining prognostic parameters for immediate continence after radical prostatectomy. The type of surgical approach (robotic vs. open radical prostatectomy) did not yield significant influence.Evaluating continence in a contemporary prospective cohort revealed 15.5 % of patients never requiring a pad postoperatively. Predictive parameters for immediate continence were erectile function, ECOG, bilateral nerve-sparing, less blood transfusion and Gleason score. Furthermore, the surgeon's experience but not his operative technique had a significant impact on immediate postoperative continence.
000128721 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-313$$a313 - Cancer risk factors and prevention (POF3-313)$$cPOF3-313$$fPOF III$$x0
000128721 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed,
000128721 7001_ $$aTeber, D.$$b1
000128721 7001_ $$0P:(DE-He78)2ef631585610340ff425c9c31fcabd03$$aTichy, D.$$b2$$udkfz
000128721 7001_ $$aPahernik, S.$$b3
000128721 7001_ $$aHadaschik, B.$$b4
000128721 7001_ $$aNyarangi-Dix, J.$$b5
000128721 7001_ $$aHohenfellner, M.$$b6
000128721 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1463303-6$$a10.1007/s00345-015-1594-4$$gVol. 34, no. 1, p. 113 - 120$$n1$$p113 - 120$$tWorld journal of urology$$v34$$x1433-8726$$y2016
000128721 909CO $$ooai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:128721$$pVDB
000128721 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)2036810-0$$6P:(DE-He78)2ef631585610340ff425c9c31fcabd03$$aDeutsches Krebsforschungszentrum$$b2$$kDKFZ
000128721 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-313$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-310$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-300$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bGesundheit$$lKrebsforschung$$vCancer risk factors and prevention$$x0
000128721 9141_ $$y2016
000128721 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz
000128721 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bWORLD J UROL : 2015
000128721 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000128721 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000128721 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000128721 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search
000128721 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC
000128721 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000128721 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000128721 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000128721 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000128721 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1110$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Clinical Medicine
000128721 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000128721 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000128721 9201_ $$0I:(DE-He78)C060-20160331$$kC060$$lBiostatistik$$x0
000128721 980__ $$ajournal
000128721 980__ $$aVDB
000128721 980__ $$aI:(DE-He78)C060-20160331
000128721 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED