% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Sommer:130580,
author = {S. A. Sommer and R. Geissler and U. Stampfl and M. B.
Wolf$^*$ and B. A. Radeleff and G. M. Richter and H.-U.
Kauczor$^*$ and P. L. Pereira and C. M. Sommer},
title = {{M}edical {L}iability and {P}atient {L}aw in {G}ermany:
{M}ain {F}eatures with {P}articular {F}ocus on {T}reatments
in the {F}ield of {I}nterventional {R}adiology.},
journal = {RöFo},
volume = {188},
number = {4},
issn = {1438-9010},
address = {Stuttgart [u.a.]},
publisher = {Thieme},
reportid = {DKFZ-2017-05659},
pages = {353 - 358},
year = {2016},
abstract = {On February 26th, 2013 the patient law became effective in
Germany. Goal of the lawmakers was a most authoritative case
law for liability of malpractice and to improve enforcement
of the rights of the patients. The following article
contains several examples detailing legal situation. By no
means should these discourage those persons who treat
patients. Rather should they be sensitized to to various
aspects of this increasingly important field of law. To
identify relevant sources according to judicial standard
research was conducted including first- and second
selection. Goal was the identification of jurisdiction,
literature and other various analyses that all deal with
liability of malpractice and patient law within the field of
Interventional Radiology--with particular focus on
transarterial chemoembolization of the liver and related
procedures. In summary, 89 different sources were included
and analyzed. The individual who treats a patient is liable
for an error in treatment if it causes injury to life, the
body or the patient's health. Independent of the error in
treatment the individual providing medical care is liable
for mistakes made in the context of obtaining informed
consent. Prerequisite is the presence of an error made when
obtaining informed consent and its causality for the
patient's consent for the treatment. Without an effective
consent the treatment is considered illegal whether it was
free of treatment error or not. The new patient law does not
cause material change of the German liablity of malpractice
law.•On February 26th, 2013 the new patient law came into
effect. Materially, there was no fundamental remodeling of
the German liability for medical malpractice. •Regarding a
physician's liability for medical malpractice two different
elements of an offence come into consideration: for one the
liability for malpractice and, in turn, liability for errors
made during medical consultation in the process of obtaining
informed consent. •Forensic practice shows that patients
frequently enforce both offences concurrently.},
cin = {E010 / E015},
ddc = {070},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)E010-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)E015-20160331},
pnm = {315 - Imaging and radiooncology (POF3-315)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-315},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:26716403},
doi = {10.1055/s-0041-108198},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/130580},
}