% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Gabry:131578,
author = {H. S. Gabryś$^*$ and F. Buettner and F. Sterzing$^*$ and
H. Hauswald$^*$ and M. Bangert$^*$},
title = {{P}arotid gland mean dose as a xerostomia predictor in
low-dose domains.},
journal = {Acta oncologica},
volume = {56},
number = {9},
issn = {0284-186X},
address = {Abingdon},
publisher = {Taylor $\&$ Francis Group},
reportid = {DKFZ-2017-06210},
pages = {1197 - 1203},
year = {2017},
abstract = {Xerostomia is a common side effect of radiotherapy
resulting from excessive irradiation of salivary glands.
Typically, xerostomia is modeled by the mean dose-response
characteristic of parotid glands and prevented by mean dose
constraints to either contralateral or both parotid glands.
The aim of this study was to investigate whether normal
tissue complication probability (NTCP) models based on the
mean radiation dose to parotid glands are suitable for the
prediction of xerostomia in a highly conformal low-dose
regime of modern intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)
techniques.We present a retrospective analysis of 153 head
and neck cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. The
Lyman Kutcher Burman (LKB) model was used to evaluate
predictive power of the parotid gland mean dose with respect
to xerostomia at 6 and 12 months after the treatment. The
predictive performance of the model was evaluated by
receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and
precision-recall (PR) curves.Average mean doses to
ipsilateral and contralateral parotid glands were 25.4 Gy
and 18.7 Gy, respectively. QUANTEC constraints were met in
$74\%$ of patients. Mild to severe (G1+) xerostomia
prevalence at both 6 and 12 months was $67\%.$ Moderate to
severe (G2+) xerostomia prevalence at 6 and 12 months was
$20\%$ and $15\%,$ respectively. G1 + xerostomia was
predicted reasonably well with area under the ROC curve
ranging from 0.69 to 0.76. The LKB model failed to provide
reliable G2 + xerostomia predictions at both time
points.Reduction of the mean dose to parotid glands below
QUANTEC guidelines resulted in low G2 + xerostomia
rates. In this dose domain, the mean dose models predicted
G1 + xerostomia fairly well, however, failed to
recognize patients at risk of G2 + xerostomia. There is
a need for the development of more flexible models able to
capture complexity of dose response in this dose regime.},
cin = {E040 / E050},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)E040-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)E050-20160331},
pnm = {315 - Imaging and radiooncology (POF3-315)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-315},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:28502238},
doi = {10.1080/0284186X.2017.1324209},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/131578},
}