000131803 001__ 131803
000131803 005__ 20240229105014.0
000131803 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1002/mrm.26704
000131803 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:28394080
000131803 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0740-3194
000131803 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1522-2594
000131803 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:18722703
000131803 037__ $$aDKFZ-2018-00100
000131803 041__ $$aeng
000131803 082__ $$a610
000131803 1001_ $$aRietsch, Stefan H G$$b0
000131803 245__ $$aParallel transmit capability of various RF transmit elements and arrays at 7T MRI.
000131803 260__ $$aNew York, NY [u.a.]$$bWiley-Liss$$c2018
000131803 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000131803 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000131803 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1521447754_7049
000131803 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000131803 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000131803 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000131803 520__ $$aIn this work, 22 configurations for remote radiofrequency (RF) coil arrays consisting of different transmit element designs for 7 Tesla (T) ultrahigh-field MRI are compared by numerical simulations.Investigated transmit RF element types are rectangular loops, micro striplines, micro striplines with meanders, 250-mm shielded dipoles with meanders, and lambda over two dipoles with and without shield. These elements are combined in four different configurations of circumferential RF body arrays with four or eight transmit elements each. Comparisons included coupling behavior, degrees of freedom offered by the individual transmit patterns, and metrics like power and specific absorption rate efficiency.Coupling between neighboring RF elements is elevated (up to -7 dB) for all arrays with eight elements, whereas it is below -25 dB for arrays with only four elements. The cumulative sum of singular values points out highest degrees of freedom for the central transversal, reduced values in the central coronal, and minimum values in the sagittal slice. Concerning power and SAR efficiency, eight lambda over two dipoles are most advantageous.Among the investigated remote arrays and parameters, a combination of eight dipoles appears to be most favorable for potential use in 7T body MRI. Magn Reson Med 79:1116-1126, 2018. © 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
000131803 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-315$$a315 - Imaging and radiooncology (POF3-315)$$cPOF3-315$$fPOF III$$x0
000131803 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed,
000131803 7001_ $$aOrzada, Stephan$$b1
000131803 7001_ $$0P:(DE-He78)4444ba69faa9240d7ec86ed09e6ca04e$$aBitz, Andreas$$b2$$udkfz
000131803 7001_ $$aGratz, Marcel$$b3
000131803 7001_ $$0P:(DE-He78)022611a2317e4de40fd912e0a72293a8$$aLadd, Mark$$b4$$udkfz
000131803 7001_ $$aQuick, Harald H$$b5
000131803 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1493786-4$$a10.1002/mrm.26704$$gVol. 79, no. 2, p. 1116 - 1126$$n2$$p1116 - 1126$$tMagnetic resonance in medicine$$v79$$x0740-3194$$y2018
000131803 909CO $$ooai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:131803$$pVDB
000131803 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)2036810-0$$6P:(DE-He78)4444ba69faa9240d7ec86ed09e6ca04e$$aDeutsches Krebsforschungszentrum$$b2$$kDKFZ
000131803 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)2036810-0$$6P:(DE-He78)022611a2317e4de40fd912e0a72293a8$$aDeutsches Krebsforschungszentrum$$b4$$kDKFZ
000131803 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-315$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-310$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-300$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bGesundheit$$lKrebsforschung$$vImaging and radiooncology$$x0
000131803 9141_ $$y2018
000131803 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz
000131803 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bMAGN RESON MED : 2015
000131803 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000131803 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000131803 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000131803 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000131803 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000131803 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000131803 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1110$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Clinical Medicine
000131803 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1030$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Life Sciences
000131803 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000131803 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000131803 9201_ $$0I:(DE-He78)E020-20160331$$kE020$$lMedizinische Physik in der Radiologie$$x0
000131803 980__ $$ajournal
000131803 980__ $$aVDB
000131803 980__ $$aI:(DE-He78)E020-20160331
000131803 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED