001     132795
005     20240229105032.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1007/s10549-018-4666-5
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a pmid:29340881
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a 0167-6806
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1573-7217
|2 ISSN
037 _ _ |a DKFZ-2018-00439
041 _ _ |a eng
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Cheng, Jie
|0 0000-0002-4772-0430
|b 0
|e First author
245 _ _ |a Circulating free DNA integrity and concentration as independent prognostic markers in metastatic breast cancer.
260 _ _ |a Dordrecht [u.a.]
|c 2018
|b Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1552377176_25417
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Non-invasive blood-based molecular markers have been investigated for cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Circulating free or cell-free DNA (cfDNA) variables have been shown to be putative markers in breast cancer prognosis.Here, we investigated the potential prognostic ability of cfDNA concentration and cfDNA integrity (cfDI) in a study cohort of 268 patients by quantitative PCR. We compared cfDNA concentration and cfDI at baseline and after one cycle of therapy in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients.A significantly increased cfDI (P = 1.21E-7 for ALU and P = 1.87E-3 for LINE1) and decreased cfDNA concentration (P = 1.17E-3 for ALU and P = 1.60E-2 for LINE1) in both repetitive DNA elements after one cycle of therapy was observed. A multiple Cox regression model indicated that cfDI and cfDNA concentration can serve as independent prognostic markers in patients at baseline with HR (95% CI) of 0.70 (0.48-1.01) for ALU cfDI, 0.63 (0.44-0.92) for LINE1 cfDI, 2.44 (1.68-3.53) for ALU cfDNA concentration, and 2.12 (1.47-3.06) for LINE1 cfDNA concentration and after one cycle of therapy with HR (95% CI) of 0.59 (0.42-0.84) for ALU cfDI, 0.51 (0.36-0.74) for LINE1 cfDI, 1.59 (1.31-1.92) for ALU cfDNA concentration, and 1.30 (1.17-1.45) for LINE1 cfDNA concentration, respectively. By comparing integrated prediction error of different models, cfDNA variables were shown to improve the prognostic power of the CTC status.We hereby show that cfDNA variables, especially in combination with other markers, can serve as attractive prognostic markers for MBC patients at baseline and during the systematic therapy.
536 _ _ |a 313 - Cancer risk factors and prevention (POF3-313)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-313
|c POF3-313
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed,
700 1 _ |a Holland-Letz, Tim
|0 P:(DE-He78)457c042884c901eb0a02c18bb1d30103
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Wallwiener, Markus
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Surowy, Harald
|0 P:(DE-He78)ec311cea9d07f894e44d05a570e26e28
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Cuk, Katarina
|0 P:(DE-He78)0a8ada1f5d2ea05fc3af10cd808bfa9a
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Schott, Sarah
|0 P:(DE-He78)92c987a1eeee056d877629bfaaac5bc2
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Trumpp, Andreas
|0 P:(DE-He78)732f4fbcddb0042251aa759a2e74d3b2
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Pantel, Klaus
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Sohn, Christof
|b 8
700 1 _ |a Schneeweiss, Andreas
|b 9
700 1 _ |a Burwinkel, Barbara
|0 P:(DE-He78)15b7fd2bc02d5ef47a2fe2dd0140d2bf
|b 10
|e Last author
773 _ _ |a 10.1007/s10549-018-4666-5
|g Vol. 169, no. 1, p. 69 - 82
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2004077-5
|n 1
|p 69 - 82
|t Breast cancer research and treatment
|v 169
|y 2018
|x 1573-7217
909 C O |p VDB
|o oai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:132795
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 0
|6 0000-0002-4772-0430
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-He78)457c042884c901eb0a02c18bb1d30103
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-He78)ec311cea9d07f894e44d05a570e26e28
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-He78)0a8ada1f5d2ea05fc3af10cd808bfa9a
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 5
|6 P:(DE-He78)92c987a1eeee056d877629bfaaac5bc2
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 6
|6 P:(DE-He78)732f4fbcddb0042251aa759a2e74d3b2
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 10
|6 P:(DE-He78)15b7fd2bc02d5ef47a2fe2dd0140d2bf
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|l Krebsforschung
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-310
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-313
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-300
|v Cancer risk factors and prevention
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|b Gesundheit
914 1 _ |y 2018
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b BREAST CANCER RES TR : 2015
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1110
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Clinical Medicine
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1030
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Life Sciences
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)C080-20160331
|k C080
|l Molekulare Epidemiologie
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)C060-20160331
|k C060
|l Biostatistik
|x 1
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)A010-20160331
|k A010
|l Stammzellen und Krebs
|x 2
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)V960-20160331
|k V960
|l HI-Stem
|x 3
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)C080-20160331
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)C060-20160331
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)A010-20160331
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)V960-20160331
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21