Home > Publications database > Diagnostic Performance of One-off Flexible Sigmoidoscopy with Fecal Immunochemical Testing in a Large Screening Population. > print

001     132896
005     20240229105038.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000795
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a pmid:29287053
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a 1044-3983
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1531-5487
|2 ISSN
037 _ _ |a DKFZ-2018-00538
041 _ _ |a eng
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Niedermaier, Tobias
|0 P:(DE-He78)20dc4ad11ff465acf5b99f1e679e10b7
|b 0
|e First author
|u dkfz
245 _ _ |a Diagnostic Performance of One-off Flexible Sigmoidoscopy with Fecal Immunochemical Testing in a Large Screening Population.
260 _ _ |a Philadelphia, Pa.
|c 2018
|b Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1660051373_23715
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Flexible sigmoidoscopy and fecal immunochemical tests are established diagnostic tests for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and less invasive, less expensive, and easier to conduct than colonoscopy. However, little is known about their joint diagnostic performance compared with colonoscopy. We aimed to assess the expected diagnostic performance of joint use of flexible sigmoidoscopy and fecal immunochemical test.We assessed the overall and site-specific prevalences of colorectal neoplasms and the overall sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of a quantitative fecal immunochemical test (FOB Gold, Sentinel Diagnostics, Milano, Italy) among 3,466 participants in screening colonoscopy in Germany. Results were used to model the expected diagnostic performance of joint use of flexible sigmoidoscopy and fecal immunochemical testing.CRC and advanced adenomas were found in 29 (1%) and 354 (10%) participants, respectively. The area under the curve of fecal immunochemical testing for these outcomes could be raised from 96% to 100% and from 70% to 89%, respectively, by combining it with flexible sigmoidoscopy. At 90% specificity, sensitivity of fecal immunochemical testing would increase from 97% to 100% for CRC and from 40% to 79% for advanced adenomas.Combining flexible sigmoidoscopy and fecal immunochemical testing might strongly enhance diagnostic performance of each single test to a level close to the diagnostic performance of screening colonoscopy while avoiding many unnecessary colonoscopies.
536 _ _ |a 313 - Cancer risk factors and prevention (POF3-313)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-313
|c POF3-313
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed,
700 1 _ |a Weigl, Korbinian
|0 P:(DE-He78)f4e98340e600f7411886c21c7b778d36
|b 1
|u dkfz
700 1 _ |a Hoffmeister, Michael
|0 P:(DE-He78)6c5d058b7552d071a7fa4c5e943fff0f
|b 2
|u dkfz
700 1 _ |a Brenner, Hermann
|0 P:(DE-He78)90d5535ff896e70eed81f4a4f6f22ae2
|b 3
|e Last author
|u dkfz
773 _ _ |a 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000795
|g Vol. 29, no. 3, p. 397 - 406
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2042095-X
|n 3
|p 397 - 406
|t Epidemiology
|v 29
|y 2018
|x 1044-3983
909 C O |p VDB
|o oai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:132896
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-He78)20dc4ad11ff465acf5b99f1e679e10b7
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-He78)f4e98340e600f7411886c21c7b778d36
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-He78)6c5d058b7552d071a7fa4c5e943fff0f
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-He78)90d5535ff896e70eed81f4a4f6f22ae2
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Gesundheit
|l Krebsforschung
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-310
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-313
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-300
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Cancer risk factors and prevention
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2018
915 _ _ |a Allianz-Lizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0410
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a National-Konsortium
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0430
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b EPIDEMIOLOGY : 2015
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0130
|2 StatID
|b Social Sciences Citation Index
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1180
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Social and Behavioral Sciences
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1110
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Clinical Medicine
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1030
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Life Sciences
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b EPIDEMIOLOGY : 2015
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)C070-20160331
|k C070
|l C070 Klinische Epidemiologie und Alternf.
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)L101-20160331
|k L101
|l DKTK Heidelberg
|x 1
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)G110-20160331
|k G110
|l Präventive Onkologie
|x 2
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)C070-20160331
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)L101-20160331
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)G110-20160331
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21