001     132908
005     20240229105039.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1007/s00259-018-3940-4
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a pmid:29478081
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a 0340-6997
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1432-105X
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1619-7070
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1619-7089
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a altmetric:33727972
|2 altmetric
037 _ _ |a DKFZ-2018-00550
041 _ _ |a eng
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a da Silva, N. A.
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Hybrid MR-PET of brain tumours using amino acid PET and chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI.
260 _ _ |a Heidelberg [u.a.]
|c 2018
|b Springer-Verl.
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1526384763_14695
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a PET using radiolabelled amino acids has become a promising tool in the diagnostics of gliomas and brain metastasis. Current research is focused on the evaluation of amide proton transfer (APT) chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MR imaging for brain tumour imaging. In this hybrid MR-PET study, brain tumours were compared using 3D data derived from APT-CEST MRI and amino acid PET using O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (18F-FET).Eight patients with gliomas were investigated simultaneously with 18F-FET PET and APT-CEST MRI using a 3-T MR-BrainPET scanner. CEST imaging was based on a steady-state approach using a B1 average power of 1μT. B0 field inhomogeneities were corrected a Prametric images of magnetisation transfer ratio asymmetry (MTRasym) and differences to the extrapolated semi-solid magnetisation transfer reference method, APT# and nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE#), were calculated. Statistical analysis of the tumour-to-brain ratio of the CEST data was performed against PET data using the non-parametric Wilcoxon test.A tumour-to-brain ratio derived from APT# and 18F-FET presented no significant differences, and no correlation was found between APT# and 18F-FET PET data. The distance between local hot spot APT# and 18F-FET were different (average 20 ± 13 mm, range 4-45 mm).For the first time, CEST images were compared with 18F-FET in a simultaneous MR-PET measurement. Imaging findings derived from18F-FET PET and APT CEST MRI seem to provide different biological information. The validation of these imaging findings by histological confirmation is necessary, ideally using stereotactic biopsy.
536 _ _ |a 315 - Imaging and radiooncology (POF3-315)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-315
|c POF3-315
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed,
700 1 _ |a Lohmann, P.
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Fairney, J.
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Magill, Arthur
|0 P:(DE-He78)5ceba3ebae6ecd5e27fa39a0365ff08e
|b 3
|u dkfz
700 1 _ |a Oros Peusquens, A-M
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Choi, C-H
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Stirnberg, R.
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Stoffels, G.
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Galldiks, N.
|b 8
700 1 _ |a Golay, X.
|b 9
700 1 _ |a Langen, K-J
|b 10
700 1 _ |a Jon Shah, N.
|b 11
773 _ _ |a 10.1007/s00259-018-3940-4
|g Vol. 45, no. 6, p. 1031 - 1040
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2098375-X
|n 6
|p 1031 - 1040
|t European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
|v 45
|y 2018
|x 1619-7089
909 C O |o oai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:132908
|p VDB
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-He78)5ceba3ebae6ecd5e27fa39a0365ff08e
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|l Krebsforschung
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-310
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-315
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-300
|v Imaging and radiooncology
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|b Gesundheit
914 1 _ |y 2018
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b EUR J NUCL MED MOL I : 2015
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1110
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Clinical Medicine
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1030
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Life Sciences
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b EUR J NUCL MED MOL I : 2015
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)E020-20160331
|k E020
|l Medizinische Physik in der Radiologie
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)E020-20160331
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21