% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Wensing:132950,
author = {M. Wensing and P. K. Kolle and J. Szecsenyi and C.
Stock$^*$ and G. Laux},
title = {{E}ffects of a program to strengthen general practice care
on hospitalisation rates: a comparative observational
study.},
journal = {Scandinavian journal of primary health care},
volume = {36},
number = {2},
issn = {1502-7724},
address = {Abingdon},
publisher = {Taylor $\&$ Francis Group},
reportid = {DKFZ-2018-00589},
pages = {109 - 114},
year = {2018},
abstract = {To determine the effect of a large-scale program to
strengthen general practice on hospitalisation rates.This
observational study compared enrolled patients in the
program and a sample of non-participating patients from
non-participating GPs in the same geographic area in
Germany. Key components of the program are: prompt access to
care, comprehensiveness, continuity, empanelment,
data-driven quality improvement, computerized decision
support, and additional reimbursement of general practices.
The outcomes in this study were hospitalisation,
rehospitalisation, and avoidable hospital admission up to
four years after patient inclusion. Poisson regression
models and generalized estimating equations were used to
estimate intervention effects.In the baseline year, $19.1\%$
were hospitalised and $13.6\%$ had a potentially avoidable
hospitalisation, $14.5\%$ were rehospitalised within 4
weeks. Across the four observed years, yearly
hospitalisations were 9.8 to $14.9\%$ lower in enrolled
patients, yearly re-hospitalisations were 5.3 to $11.5\%$
lower, and yearly avoidable hospitalisations were 6.8 to
$8.6\%$ lower compared to the control cohort (all
differences were statistically significant). The trend in
the between-group difference for hospitalisations and
re-hospitalisations increased, while it remained stable for
avoidable hospitalisations.This study provides strong
indications for the positive impact of strong general
practice care on population outcomes. Key points A program
to strengthen general practice in Germany comprised of
prompt access to care, comprehensiveness, continuity,
empanelment, data-driven quality improvement, computerized
decision support, and additional reimbursement of general
practices. Patients who remained in the program during 4
years had increasingly lowered rates of hospitalisation and
rehospitalisation compared to a control group of patients.
Avoidable hospitalisations were also lower, but no trend of
further lowering was found. This might suggest a ceiling
effect to impact of strong general practice on
hospitalisations.},
cin = {C070},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C070-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Cancer risk factors and prevention (POF3-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:29623749},
doi = {10.1080/02813432.2018.1459429},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/132950},
}