% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Bickelhaupt:135948,
author = {S. Bickelhaupt$^*$ and P. F. Jaeger$^*$ and F. Laun$^*$ and
W. Lederer$^*$ and H. Daniel and T. A. Kuder$^*$ and L.
Wuesthof and D. Paech$^*$ and D. Bonekamp$^*$ and A.
Radbruch$^*$ and S. Delorme$^*$ and H.-P. Schlemmer$^*$ and
F. H. Steudle and K. Maier-Hein$^*$},
title = {{R}adiomics {B}ased on {A}dapted {D}iffusion {K}urtosis
{I}maging {H}elps to {C}larify {M}ost {M}ammographic
{F}indings {S}uspicious for {C}ancer.},
journal = {Radiology},
volume = {287},
number = {3},
issn = {1527-1315},
address = {Oak Brook, Ill.},
publisher = {Soc.},
reportid = {DKFZ-2018-00685},
pages = {761 - 770},
year = {2018},
abstract = {Purpose To evaluate a radiomics model of Breast Imaging
Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4 and 5 breast lesions
extracted from breast-tissue-optimized kurtosis magnetic
resonance (MR) imaging for lesion characterization by using
a sensitivity threshold similar to that of biopsy. Materials
and Methods This institutional study included 222 women at
two independent study sites (site 1: training set of 95
patients; mean age ± standard deviation, 58.6 years ± 6.6;
61 malignant and 34 benign lesions; site 2: independent test
set of 127 patients; mean age, 58.2 years ± 6.8; 61
malignant and 66 benign lesions). All women presented with a
finding suspicious for cancer at x-ray mammography (BI-RADS
4 or 5) and an indication for biopsy. Before biopsy,
diffusion-weighted MR imaging (b values, 0-1500 sec/mm2) was
performed by using 1.5-T imagers from different MR imaging
vendors. Lesions were segmented and voxel-based kurtosis
fitting adapted to account for fat signal contamination was
performed. A radiomics feature model was developed by using
a random forest regressor. The fixed model was tested on an
independent test set. Conventional interpretations of MR
imaging were also assessed for comparison. Results The
radiomics feature model reduced false-positive results from
66 to 20 (specificity $70.0\%$ [46 of 66]) at the predefined
sensitivity of greater than $98.0\%$ [60 of 61] in the
independent test set, with BI-RADS 4a and 4b lesions
benefiting from the analysis (specificity $74.0\%,$ [37 of
50]; $60.0\%$ [nine of 15]) and BI-RADS 5 lesions showing no
added benefit. The model significantly improved specificity
compared with the median apparent diffusion coefficient (P <
.001) and apparent kurtosis coefficient (P = .02) alone.
Conventional reading of dynamic contrast material-enhanced
MR imaging provided sensitivity of $91.8\%$ (56 of 61) and a
specificity of $74.2\%$ (49 of 66). Accounting for fat
signal intensity during fitting significantly improved the
area under the curve of the model (P = .001). Conclusion A
radiomics model based on kurtosis diffusion-weighted imaging
performed by using MR imaging machines from different
vendors allowed for reliable differentiation between
malignant and benign breast lesions in both a training and
an independent test data set. © RSNA, 2018 Online
supplemental material is available for this article.},
cin = {E010 / E230 / E132 / E020},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)E010-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)E230-20160331 /
I:(DE-He78)E132-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)E020-20160331},
pnm = {315 - Imaging and radiooncology (POF3-315)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-315},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:29461172},
doi = {10.1148/radiol.2017170273},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/135948},
}