001     135955
005     20240229105048.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1002/ijc.31233
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a pmid:29277897
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a 0020-7136
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1097-0215
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a altmetric:45255737
|2 altmetric
037 _ _ |a DKFZ-2018-00692
041 _ _ |a eng
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Gies, Anton
|0 0000-0002-7823-4216
|b 0
|e First author
245 _ _ |a Quantitative fecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer screening.
260 _ _ |a Bognor Regis
|c 2018
|b Wiley-Liss
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1554371784_31855
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
|x Review Article
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) for hemoglobin (Hb) are increasingly used for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. We aimed to review, summarize and compare reported diagnostic performance of various FITs. PubMed and Web of Science were searched from inception to July 24, 2017. Data on diagnostic performance of quantitative FITs, conducted in colonoscopy-controlled average-risk screening populations, were extracted. Summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted and correlations between thresholds, positivity rates (PRs), sensitivities and specificities were assessed. Seven test brands were investigated across 22 studies. Although reported sensitivities for CRC, advanced adenoma (AA) and any advanced neoplasm (AN) varied widely (ranges: 25-100%, 6-44% and 9-60%, respectively), with specificities for AN ranging from 82% to 99%, the estimates were very close to the respective summary ROC curves whose areas under the curve (95% CI) were 0.905 (0.88-0.94), 0.683 (0.67-0.70) and 0.710 (0.70-0.72) for CRC, AA and AN, respectively. The seemingly large heterogeneity essentially reflected variations in test thresholds (range: 2-82 µg Hb/g feces) and showed moderate correlations with sensitivity (r = -0.49) and specificity (r = 0.60) for AN. By contrast, observed PRs (range: 1-21%) almost perfectly correlated with sensitivity (r = 0.84) and specificity (r = -0.94) for AN. The apparent large heterogeneity in diagnostic performance between various FITs can be almost completely overcome by appropriate threshold adjustments. Instead of simply applying the threshold recommended by the manufacturer, screening programs should adjust the threshold to yield a desired PR which is a very good proxy indicator for the specificity and the subsequent colonoscopy workload.
536 _ _ |a 313 - Cancer risk factors and prevention (POF3-313)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-313
|c POF3-313
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed,
700 1 _ |a Bhardwaj, Megha
|0 P:(DE-He78)ac7aed57f26354e8a484b5d257f7bada
|b 1
|u dkfz
700 1 _ |a Stock, Christian
|0 P:(DE-He78)908880209a64ea539ae8dc5fdb7e0a91
|b 2
|u dkfz
700 1 _ |a Schrotz-King, Petra
|0 P:(DE-He78)01ef71f71b01a3ec3b698653fd43fe86
|b 3
|u dkfz
700 1 _ |a Brenner, Hermann
|0 P:(DE-He78)90d5535ff896e70eed81f4a4f6f22ae2
|b 4
|e Last author
|u dkfz
773 _ _ |a 10.1002/ijc.31233
|g Vol. 143, no. 2, p. 234 - 244
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1474822-8
|n 2
|p 234 - 244
|t International journal of cancer
|v 143
|y 2018
|x 0020-7136
909 C O |p VDB
|o oai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:135955
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 0
|6 0000-0002-7823-4216
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-He78)ac7aed57f26354e8a484b5d257f7bada
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-He78)908880209a64ea539ae8dc5fdb7e0a91
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-He78)01ef71f71b01a3ec3b698653fd43fe86
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-He78)90d5535ff896e70eed81f4a4f6f22ae2
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|l Krebsforschung
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-310
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-313
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-300
|v Cancer risk factors and prevention
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|b Gesundheit
914 1 _ |y 2018
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b INT J CANCER : 2015
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1030
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Life Sciences
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b INT J CANCER : 2015
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)C070-20160331
|k C070
|l Klinische Epidemiologie und Alternsforschung
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)G110-20160331
|k G110
|l Präventive Onkologie
|x 1
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)L101-20160331
|k L101
|l DKTK Heidelberg
|x 2
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)C070-20160331
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)G110-20160331
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)L101-20160331
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21