001     136793
005     20240229105059.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1007/s00259-018-4009-0
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a pmid:29732524
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a 0340-6997
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1432-105X
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1619-7070
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1619-7089
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a altmetric:40865387
|2 altmetric
037 _ _ |a DKFZ-2018-01231
041 _ _ |a eng
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Röhrich, Manuel
|0 0000-0001-7609-243X
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Integrated analysis of dynamic FET PET/CT parameters, histology, and methylation profiling of 44 gliomas.
260 _ _ |a Heidelberg [u.a.]
|c 2018
|b Springer-Verl.
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1536239611_3642
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Dynamic 18F-FET PET/CT is a powerful tool for the diagnosis of gliomas.18F-FET PET time-activity curves (TAC) allow differentiation between histological low-grade gliomas (LGG) and high-grade gliomas (HGG). Molecular methods such as epigenetic profiling are of rising importance for glioma grading and subclassification. Here, we analysed dynamic 18F-FET PET data, and the histological and epigenetic features of 44 gliomas.Dynamic 18F-FET PET was performed in 44 patients with newly diagnosed, untreated glioma: 10 WHO grade II glioma, 13 WHO grade III glioma and 21 glioblastoma (GBM). All patients underwent stereotactic biopsy or tumour resection after 18F-FET PET imaging. As well as histological analysis of tissue samples, DNA was subjected to epigenetic analysis using the Illumina 850 K methylation array. TACs, standardized uptake values corrected for background uptake in healthy tissue (SUVmax/BG), time to peak (TTP) and kinetic modelling parameters were correlated with histological diagnoses and with epigenetic signatures. Multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FET PET in relation to the tumour groups identified by histological and methylation-based analysis.Epigenetic profiling led to substantial tumour reclassification, with six grade II/III gliomas reclassified as GBM. Overlap of HGG-typical TACs and LGG-typical TACs was dramatically reduced when tumours were clustered on the basis of their methylation profile. SUVmax/BG values of GBM were higher than those of LGGs following both histological diagnosis and methylation-based diagnosis. The differences in TTP between GBMs and grade II/III gliomas were greater following methylation-based diagnosis than following histological diagnosis. Kinetic modeling showed that relative K1 and fractal dimension (FD) values significantly differed in histology- and methylation-based GBM and grade II/III glioma between those diagnosed histologically and those diagnosed by methylation analysis. Multivariate analysis revealed slightly greater diagnostic accuracy with methylation-based diagnosis. IDH-mutant gliomas and GBM subgroups tended to differ in their 18F-FET PET kinetics.The status of dynamic 18F-FET PET as a biologically and clinically relevant imaging modality is confirmed in the context of molecular glioma diagnosis.
536 _ _ |a 315 - Imaging and radiooncology (POF3-315)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-315
|c POF3-315
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed,
700 1 _ |a Huang, Kristin
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Schrimpf, Daniel
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Albert, Nathalie L
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Hielscher, Thomas
|0 P:(DE-He78)743a4a82daab55306a2c88b9f6bf8c2f
|b 4
|u dkfz
700 1 _ |a von Deimling, Andreas
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Schüller, Ulrich
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss, Antonia
|0 P:(DE-He78)b2df3652dfa3e19d5e96dfc53f44a992
|b 7
|u dkfz
700 1 _ |a Haberkorn, Uwe
|0 P:(DE-He78)13a0afba029f5f64dc18b25ef7499558
|b 8
|e Last author
|u dkfz
773 _ _ |a 10.1007/s00259-018-4009-0
|g Vol. 45, no. 9, p. 1573 - 1584
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2098375-X
|n 9
|p 1573 - 1584
|t European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
|v 45
|y 2018
|x 1619-7089
909 C O |o oai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:136793
|p VDB
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-He78)743a4a82daab55306a2c88b9f6bf8c2f
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 7
|6 P:(DE-He78)b2df3652dfa3e19d5e96dfc53f44a992
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 8
|6 P:(DE-He78)13a0afba029f5f64dc18b25ef7499558
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|l Krebsforschung
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-310
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-315
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-300
|v Imaging and radiooncology
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|b Gesundheit
914 1 _ |y 2018
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b EUR J NUCL MED MOL I : 2015
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1110
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Clinical Medicine
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1030
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Life Sciences
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b EUR J NUCL MED MOL I : 2015
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)C060-20160331
|k C060
|l Biostatistik
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)E060-20160331
|k E060
|l KKE Nuklearmedizin
|x 1
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)C060-20160331
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)E060-20160331
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21