% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Sweegers:137585,
author = {M. G. Sweegers and T. M. Altenburg and J. Brug and A. M.
May and J. K. van Vulpen and N. K. Aaronson and G. Arbane
and M. Bohus and K. S. Courneya and A. J. Daley and D. A.
Galvao and R. Garrod and K. A. Griffith and W. H. Van Harten
and S. C. Hayes and F. Herrero-Román and M. J. Kersten and
A. Lucia and A. McConnachie and W. van Mechelen and N.
Mutrie and R. U. Newton and F. Nollet and K. Potthoff and M.
Schmidt$^*$ and K. H. Schmitz and K. H. Schulz and G. Sonke
and K. Steindorf$^*$ and M. M. Stuiver and D. R. Taaffe and
L. Thorsen and J. W. Twisk and M. J. Velthuis and J. Wenzel
and K. M. Winters-Stone and J. Wiskemann and M. J. Chin A
Paw and L. M. Buffart},
title = {{E}ffects and moderators of exercise on muscle strength,
muscle function and aerobic fitness in patients with cancer:
a meta-analysis of individual patient data.},
journal = {British journal of sports medicine},
volume = {53},
number = {13},
issn = {1473-0480},
address = {London},
publisher = {BMJ Publ. Group},
reportid = {DKFZ-2018-01465},
pages = {812},
year = {2019},
abstract = {To optimally target exercise interventions for patients
with cancer, it is important to identify which patients
benefit from which interventions.We conducted an individual
patient data meta-analysis to investigate demographic,
clinical, intervention-related and exercise-related
moderators of exercise intervention effects on physical
fitness in patients with cancer.We identified relevant
studies via systematic searches in electronic databases
(PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL).We analysed data from
28 randomised controlled trials investigating the effects of
exercise on upper body muscle strength (UBMS) and lower body
muscle strength (LBMS), lower body muscle function (LBMF)
and aerobic fitness in adult patients with cancer.Exercise
significantly improved UBMS (β=0.20, $95\%$ Confidence
Interval (CI) 0.14 to 0.26), LBMS (β=0.29, $95\%$ CI 0.23
to 0.35), LBMF (β=0.16, $95\%$ CI 0.08 to 0.24) and aerobic
fitness (β=0.28, $95\%$ CI 0.23 to 0.34), with larger
effects for supervised interventions. Exercise effects on
UBMS were larger during treatment, when supervised
interventions included ≥3 sessions per week, when
resistance exercises were included and when session duration
was >60 min. Exercise effects on LBMS were larger for
patients who were living alone, for supervised interventions
including resistance exercise and when session duration was
>60 min. Exercise effects on aerobic fitness were larger
for younger patients and when supervised interventions
included aerobic exercise.Exercise interventions during and
following cancer treatment had small effects on UBMS, LBMS,
LBMF and aerobic fitness. Demographic, intervention-related
and exercise-related characteristics including age, marital
status, intervention timing, delivery mode and frequency and
type and time of exercise sessions moderated the exercise
effect on UBMS, LBMS and aerobic fitness.},
subtyp = {Review Article},
cin = {C110},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C110-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Cancer risk factors and prevention (POF3-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:30181323},
doi = {10.1136/bjsports-2018-099191},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/137585},
}