000140838 001__ 140838
000140838 005__ 20240229105117.0
000140838 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.mri.2018.07.010
000140838 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:30053430
000140838 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0730-725X
000140838 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1873-5894
000140838 037__ $$aDKFZ-2018-01593
000140838 041__ $$aeng
000140838 082__ $$a610
000140838 1001_ $$aChacon-Caldera, Jorge$$b0
000140838 245__ $$aEvaluation of stacked resonators to enhance the performance of a surface receive-only array for prostate MRI at 3 Tesla.
000140838 260__ $$aAmsterdam [u.a.]$$bElsevier Science$$c2018
000140838 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000140838 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000140838 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1540360981_3352
000140838 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000140838 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000140838 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000140838 520__ $$aProstate MRI is an important tool to diagnose and characterize cancer. High local sensitivity and good parallel imaging performance are of paramount importance for diagnostic quality and efficiency. The purpose of this work was to evaluate stacked resonators as part of a surface receiver array for prostate MRI at 3 Tesla. A base array of 6-channels consisting of a flexible anterior and a rigid posterior part were built each with three loop coils. A pair of stacked resonators was added concentrically to the center loops (anterior and posterior) of the base array. The evaluated stacked resonators were butterflies, composites and dipoles which yielded a total of three 8-channel arrays. The arrays were compared using noise correlations and single-channel signal-to-noise ratio maps in a phantom. Combined signal-to-noise ratio maps and parallel imaging performances were measured and compared in vivo in 6 healthy volunteers. The results were compared to the base and a commercial array. The SNR values in the prostate yielded by all the arrays were not statistically different using fully sampled k-space. However, significant differences were found in the parallel imaging performance of the arrays. More specifically, up to 88% geometric factor reduction was found compared to the commercial array and up to 83% reduction compared to the base array using butterfly coils. Thus, signal-to-noise ratio improvements were observed with stacked resonators when using parallel imaging. The use of stacked elements, in particular butterfly coils, can improve the performance of a base array consisting solely of single loops when using parallel imaging. We expect prostate MRI at 3 Tesla to benefit from using combinations of single loops and stacked resonators.
000140838 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-315$$a315 - Imaging and radiooncology (POF3-315)$$cPOF3-315$$fPOF III$$x0
000140838 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed,
000140838 7001_ $$aFischer, Alexander$$b1
000140838 7001_ $$aMalzacher, Matthias$$b2
000140838 7001_ $$aVetter, Yannik$$b3
000140838 7001_ $$aDavids, Mathias$$b4
000140838 7001_ $$0P:(DE-He78)cce06651cdcf863bbdcc14cc7b704c98$$aFlöser, Martina$$b5$$udkfz
000140838 7001_ $$aStumpf, Christopher$$b6
000140838 7001_ $$aSchad, Lothar R$$b7
000140838 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1500646-3$$a10.1016/j.mri.2018.07.010$$gVol. 53, p. 164 - 172$$p164 - 172$$tMagnetic resonance imaging$$v53$$x0730-725X$$y2018
000140838 909CO $$ooai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:140838$$pVDB
000140838 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)2036810-0$$6P:(DE-He78)cce06651cdcf863bbdcc14cc7b704c98$$aDeutsches Krebsforschungszentrum$$b5$$kDKFZ
000140838 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-315$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-310$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-300$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bGesundheit$$lKrebsforschung$$vImaging and radiooncology$$x0
000140838 9141_ $$y2018
000140838 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz
000140838 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000140838 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000140838 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bMAGN RESON IMAGING : 2017
000140838 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000140838 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search
000140838 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC
000140838 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List
000140838 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000140838 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000140838 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000140838 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1110$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Clinical Medicine
000140838 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000140838 9201_ $$0I:(DE-He78)E020-20160331$$kE020$$lMedizinische Physik in der Radiologie$$x0
000140838 980__ $$ajournal
000140838 980__ $$aVDB
000140838 980__ $$aI:(DE-He78)E020-20160331
000140838 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED