001     140861
005     20240229105118.0
024 7 _ |a 10.2147/CLEP.S170169
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a pmid:30271216
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a pmc:PMC6147538
|2 pmc
024 7 _ |a altmetric:48504777
|2 altmetric
037 _ _ |a DKFZ-2018-01616
041 _ _ |a eng
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Niedermaier, Tobias
|0 P:(DE-He78)20dc4ad11ff465acf5b99f1e679e10b7
|b 0
|e First author
|u dkfz
245 _ _ |a Accuracy of a fecal immunochemical test according to outside temperature and travel time.
260 _ _ |a Albany, Auckland
|c 2018
|b Dove Medical Press
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1660051496_23715
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) are widely used and recommended for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Fecal hemoglobin (Hb) may degrade with long transport durations and high ambient temperatures, potentially reducing sensitivity to detect CRC and its precursors. This study aimed at investigating the impact of temperatures and sample travel times on diagnostic performance of a quantitative FIT for detection of advanced neoplasms (AN, CRC, or advanced adenoma).Participants of screening colonoscopy in south-western Germany conducted a quantitative FIT prior to bowel preparation between February 2012 and June 2016. From available locations and dates of stool sampling and transport, maximum ambient temperatures were linked to 2,870 participants aged 50-79 years and sample return durations were recorded. The impact of ambient temperatures and return duration on FIT sensitivity and specificity was assessed for five different cutoffs between 10 and 25 µg Hb/g feces.At a positivity threshold of 20 µg Hb/g feces, overall sensitivity and specificity for detecting any AN were 40% (95% CI, 35-47%) and 95% (95% CI, 94-96%), respectively. Inverse associations between maximum ambient temperature (median 18.1°C, inter-quartile range [IQR] =11.4-24.9°C) and sensitivity of FIT were observed which were stronger at higher cutoffs. Sample return durations (median 6 days, IQR =4-8 days) were not associated with variable sensitivities or specificities.Hb degredation during fecal sample transportation in summer months may be of some concern for diagnostic performance of the FIT evaluated under routine conditions in a middle-European climate.
536 _ _ |a 313 - Cancer risk factors and prevention (POF3-313)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-313
|c POF3-313
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed,
700 1 _ |a Weigl, Korbinian
|0 P:(DE-He78)f4e98340e600f7411886c21c7b778d36
|b 1
|u dkfz
700 1 _ |a Gies, Anton
|0 P:(DE-He78)6d4d6a0e2d726f899086ca98cd560922
|b 2
|u dkfz
700 1 _ |a Hoffmeister, Michael
|0 P:(DE-He78)6c5d058b7552d071a7fa4c5e943fff0f
|b 3
|u dkfz
700 1 _ |a Brenner, Hermann
|0 P:(DE-He78)90d5535ff896e70eed81f4a4f6f22ae2
|b 4
|e Last author
|u dkfz
773 _ _ |a 10.2147/CLEP.S170169
|g Vol. 10, p. 1203 - 1213
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2494772-6
|p 1203 - 1213
|t Clinical epidemiology
|v 10
|y 2018
|x 1179-1349
909 C O |p VDB
|o oai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:140861
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-He78)20dc4ad11ff465acf5b99f1e679e10b7
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-He78)f4e98340e600f7411886c21c7b778d36
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-He78)6d4d6a0e2d726f899086ca98cd560922
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-He78)6c5d058b7552d071a7fa4c5e943fff0f
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-He78)90d5535ff896e70eed81f4a4f6f22ae2
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Gesundheit
|l Krebsforschung
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-310
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-313
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-300
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Cancer risk factors and prevention
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2018
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b CLIN EPIDEMIOL : 2017
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0320
|2 StatID
|b PubMed Central
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ : Blind peer review
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial CC BY-NC (No Version)
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNCNV
|2 V:(DE-HGF)
|b DOAJ
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1110
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Clinical Medicine
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)C070-20160331
|k C070
|l C070 Klinische Epidemiologie und Alternf.
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)G110-20160331
|k G110
|l Präventive Onkologie
|x 1
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)L101-20160331
|k L101
|l DKTK Heidelberg
|x 2
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)C070-20160331
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)G110-20160331
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)L101-20160331
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21