% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Rsch:141257,
author = {T. Rösch and L. Altenhofen and J. Kretschmann and B. Hagen
and H. Brenner$^*$ and C. Pox and W. Schmiegel and A.
Theilmeier and J. Aschenbeck and A. Tannapfel and D. von
Stillfried and K. Zimmermann-Fraedrich and K. Wegscheider},
title = {{R}isk of {M}alignancy in {A}denomas {D}etected {D}uring
{S}creening {C}olonoscopy.},
journal = {Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology},
volume = {16},
number = {11},
issn = {1542-3565},
address = {New York, NY},
publisher = {Elsevier Science},
reportid = {DKFZ-2018-01777},
pages = {1754 - 1761},
year = {2018},
abstract = {A higher incidence of proximal interval cancers after
colonoscopy has been reported in several follow-up studies.
One possible explanation for this might be that proximally
located adenomas have greater malignant potential. The aim
of the present study was to assess the risk of malignancy in
proximal versus distal adenomas in patients included in a
large screening colonoscopy database; adenoma shape and the
patients' age and sex distribution were also analyzed.Data
for 2007-2012 from the German National Screening Colonoscopy
Registry, including 594,614 adenomas identified during
2,532,298 screening colonoscopies, were analyzed
retrospectively. The main outcome measure was the rate of
high-grade dysplasia (HGD) in adenomas, used as a surrogate
marker for the risk of malignancy. Odds ratios (ORs) for the
rate of HGD found in adenomas were analyzed in relation to
patient- and adenoma-related factors using multivariate
analysis.HGD histology was noted in 20,873 adenomas
$(3.5\%).$ Proximal adenoma locations were not associated
with a higher HGD rate. The most significant risk factor for
HGD was adenoma size (OR 10.36 ≥1 cm vs <1 cm), followed
by patient age (OR 1.26 and 1.46 for age groups 65-74 and
75-84 vs 55-64 years) and sex (OR 1.15 male vs female). In
comparison with flat adenomas as a reference lesion, sessile
lesions had a similar HGD rate (OR 1.02) and pedunculated
adenomas had a higher rate (OR 1.23). All associations were
statistically significant (P ≤ .05).In this large
screening database, it was found that the rates of adenomas
with HGD are similar in the proximal and distal colon. The
presence of HGD as a risk marker alone does not explain
higher rates of proximal interval colorectal cancer. We
suggest that certain lesions (flat, serrated lesions) may be
missed in the proximal colon and may acquire a more
aggressive biology over time. A combination of
endoscopy-related factors and biology may therefore account
for higher rates of proximal versus distal interval
colorectal cancer.},
cin = {C070 / G110 / L101},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C070-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)G110-20160331 /
I:(DE-He78)L101-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Cancer risk factors and prevention (POF3-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:29902640},
doi = {10.1016/j.cgh.2018.05.043},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/141257},
}