001     141330
005     20240229105124.0
024 7 _ |2 doi
|a 10.1373/clinchem.2017.281543
024 7 _ |2 pmid
|a pmid:29483107
024 7 _ |2 ISSN
|a 0009-9147
024 7 _ |2 ISSN
|a 1530-8561
024 7 _ |2 altmetric
|a altmetric:67519497
037 _ _ |a DKFZ-2018-01849
041 _ _ |a eng
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Haselmann, Verena
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Liquid Profiling of Circulating Tumor DNA in Plasma of Melanoma Patients for Companion Diagnostics and Monitoring of BRAF Inhibitor Therapy.
260 _ _ |a Washington, DC
|b American Association for Clinical Chemistry
|c 2018
336 7 _ |2 DRIVER
|a article
336 7 _ |2 DataCite
|a Output Types/Journal article
336 7 _ |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
|a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|s 1677752269_19619
336 7 _ |2 BibTeX
|a ARTICLE
336 7 _ |2 ORCID
|a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
336 7 _ |0 0
|2 EndNote
|a Journal Article
500 _ _ |a 317
520 _ _ |a The current standard for determining eligibility of patients with metastatic melanoma for BRAF-targeted therapy is tissue-based testing of BRAF mutations. As patients are rarely rebiopsied, detection in blood might be advantageous by enabling a comprehensive assessment of tumor mutational status in real time and thereby representing a noninvasive biomarker for monitoring BRAF therapy.In all, 634 stage I to IV melanoma patients were enrolled at 2 centers, and 1406 plasma samples were prospectively collected. Patients were assigned to 3 separate study cohorts: study 1 for assessment of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as part of companion diagnostics, study 2 for assessment of ctDNA for patients with low tumor burden and for follow-up, and study 3 for monitoring of resistance to BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi) or mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitor therapy.Overall, a high degree of concordance between plasma and tissue testing results was observed at 90.9% (study 1) and 90.1% (study 2), respectively. Interestingly, discrepant results were in some cases associated with nonresponse to BRAFi (n = 3) or a secondary BRAF-mutant malignancy (n = 5). Importantly, ctDNA results correlated with the clinical course of disease in 95.7% and with response to treatment. Significantly, the detection of BRAF mutant ctDNA preceded relapse assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, and was more specific than serum S100 and lactate dehydrogenase.Blood-based testing compares favorably with standard-of-care tissue-based BRAF mutation testing. Importantly, blood-based BRAF testing correlates with the clinical course, even for early-stage patients, and may be used to predict response to treatment, recurrence, and resistance before radioimaging under BRAFi therapy, thereby enabling considerable improvements in patient treatment.
536 _ _ |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-317
|a 317 - Translational cancer research (POF3-317)
|c POF3-317
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed,
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-He78)d239d6a28875058b40c13266babadb58
|a Gebhardt, Christoffer
|b 1
|e First author
700 1 _ |a Brechtel, Ingrid
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Duda, Angelika
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Czerwinski, Claudia
|b 4
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Sucker, Antje
|b 5
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-He78)457c042884c901eb0a02c18bb1d30103
|a Holland-Letz, Tim
|b 6
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-He78)a229f7724466e7efadf4a1ace1ff8af3
|a Utikal, Jochen
|b 7
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Schadendorf, Dirk
|b 8
700 1 _ |a Neumaier, Michael
|b 9
773 _ _ |0 PERI:(DE-600)1468161-4
|a 10.1373/clinchem.2017.281543
|g Vol. 64, no. 5, p. 830 - 842
|n 5
|p 830 - 842
|t Clinical chemistry
|v 64
|x 1530-8561
|y 2018
909 C O |o oai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:141330
|p VDB
910 1 _ |0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|6 P:(DE-He78)d239d6a28875058b40c13266babadb58
|a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|b 1
|k DKFZ
910 1 _ |0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|b 5
|k DKFZ
910 1 _ |0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|6 P:(DE-He78)457c042884c901eb0a02c18bb1d30103
|a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|b 6
|k DKFZ
910 1 _ |0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|6 P:(DE-He78)a229f7724466e7efadf4a1ace1ff8af3
|a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|b 7
|k DKFZ
910 1 _ |0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|b 8
|k DKFZ
913 1 _ |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-317
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-310
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-300
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|a DE-HGF
|b Gesundheit
|l Krebsforschung
|v Translational cancer research
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2018
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b Medline
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|a JCR
|b CLIN CHEM : 2017
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|a WoS
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|a WoS
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1030
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b Current Contents - Life Sciences
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b BIOSIS Previews
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|a IF >= 5
|b CLIN CHEM : 2017
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)G300-20160331
|k G300
|l KKE Dermatoonkologie
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)C060-20160331
|k C060
|l C060 Biostatistik
|x 1
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)L401-20160331
|k L401
|l DKTK Essen
|x 2
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)G300-20160331
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)C060-20160331
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)L401-20160331
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21