Home > Publications database > Gd contrast administration is dispensable in patients with MS without new T2 lesions on follow-up MRI. > print |
001 | 141398 | ||
005 | 20240229105126.0 | ||
024 | 7 | _ | |a 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000480 |2 doi |
024 | 7 | _ | |a pmid:30038948 |2 pmid |
024 | 7 | _ | |a pmc:PMC6053940 |2 pmc |
024 | 7 | _ | |a altmetric:46474373 |2 altmetric |
037 | _ | _ | |a DKFZ-2018-01904 |
041 | _ | _ | |a eng |
082 | _ | _ | |a 610 |
100 | 1 | _ | |a Karimian-Jazi, Kianush |b 0 |
245 | _ | _ | |a Gd contrast administration is dispensable in patients with MS without new T2 lesions on follow-up MRI. |
260 | _ | _ | |a Philadelphia, Pa. |c 2018 |b Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
336 | 7 | _ | |a article |2 DRIVER |
336 | 7 | _ | |a Output Types/Journal article |2 DataCite |
336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |b journal |m journal |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16 |s 1659956504_8495 |2 PUB:(DE-HGF) |
336 | 7 | _ | |a ARTICLE |2 BibTeX |
336 | 7 | _ | |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE |2 ORCID |
336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |0 0 |2 EndNote |
500 | _ | _ | |a Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation |
520 | _ | _ | |a To assess the diagnostic value of gadolinium (Gd) contrast administration in MRI follow-up examinations of patients with MS if the T2 lesion load is stable.We included 100 patients with MS with at least 2 cranial MRI follow-up examinations (mean follow-up time 4.0 ± 2.6 years). MRI was performed at 3 Tesla with a standardized protocol including T2-weighted, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and T1-weighted contrast-enhanced sequences. Images were analyzed for T2/FLAIR and contrast-enhancing (CE) lesions by 3 independent neuroradiologists. Isolated Gd-enhancing lesions without correlate in T2 and FLAIR images, and reactivated Gd+ lesions were further assessed for size and signal intensity.We identified a total of 343 new T2 lesions and 152 CE lesions in a total of 559 MRI follow-up examinations. New T2/FLAIR lesions were present in 30% of the scans. Of the Gd-enhancing lesions, 145/152 (95.4%) showed a correlate as a new T2/FLAIR lesion. There were 3 enhancing lesions (1.9% of all enhancing lesions) without T2/FLAIR correlate and 4 lesions (2.6%) that exhibited lesion reactivation or persistent enhancement over time. As a predictive factor of enhancement, we found that enhancing lesions had a higher T2 signal ratio (T2 SRlesion/normal-appearing white matter: 3.0 ± 0.1 vs 2.2 ± 0.1, p < 0.001).The likelihood of missing 'active lesions' is overall small (1.7%) if T2 lesions are stable compared with the previous MRI examination. Lesion reactivation is rare. Our study indicates that Gd contrast administration might be dispensable in follow-up MRI of patients with MS if no new T2/FLAIR lesions and no new neurologic symptoms are present. |
536 | _ | _ | |a 317 - Translational cancer research (POF3-317) |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-317 |c POF3-317 |f POF III |x 0 |
588 | _ | _ | |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Wildemann, Brigitte |b 1 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Diem, Ricarda |0 P:(DE-He78)0b1c40947becd495c5aa9778ef098ef4 |b 2 |u dkfz |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Schwarz, Daniel |0 P:(DE-He78)a46ef05266eafb5f42c207880f97ebf6 |b 3 |u dkfz |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Hielscher, Thomas |0 P:(DE-He78)743a4a82daab55306a2c88b9f6bf8c2f |b 4 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Wick, Wolfgang |0 P:(DE-He78)92e9783ca7025f36ce14e12cd348d2ee |b 5 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Bendszus, Martin |b 6 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Breckwoldt, Michael |0 P:(DE-He78)5ba5b48bd126214d9cb66291fa4ae303 |b 7 |e Last author |u dkfz |
773 | _ | _ | |a 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000480 |g Vol. 5, no. 5, p. e480 - |0 PERI:(DE-600)2767740-0 |n 5 |p e480 |t Neurology |v 5 |y 2018 |x 2332-7812 |
909 | C | O | |p VDB |o oai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:141398 |
910 | 1 | _ | |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum |0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0 |k DKFZ |b 2 |6 P:(DE-He78)0b1c40947becd495c5aa9778ef098ef4 |
910 | 1 | _ | |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum |0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0 |k DKFZ |b 3 |6 P:(DE-He78)a46ef05266eafb5f42c207880f97ebf6 |
910 | 1 | _ | |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum |0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0 |k DKFZ |b 4 |6 P:(DE-He78)743a4a82daab55306a2c88b9f6bf8c2f |
910 | 1 | _ | |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum |0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0 |k DKFZ |b 5 |6 P:(DE-He78)92e9783ca7025f36ce14e12cd348d2ee |
910 | 1 | _ | |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum |0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0 |k DKFZ |b 7 |6 P:(DE-He78)5ba5b48bd126214d9cb66291fa4ae303 |
913 | 1 | _ | |a DE-HGF |b Gesundheit |l Krebsforschung |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-310 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-317 |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-300 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |v Translational cancer research |x 0 |
914 | 1 | _ | |y 2018 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200 |2 StatID |b SCOPUS |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300 |2 StatID |b Medline |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0320 |2 StatID |b PubMed Central |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501 |2 StatID |b DOAJ Seal |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500 |2 StatID |b DOAJ |
915 | _ | _ | |a Peer Review |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030 |2 StatID |b DOAJ : Blind peer review |
915 | _ | _ | |a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs CC BY-NC-ND (No Version) |0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNCNDNV |2 V:(DE-HGF) |b DOAJ |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199 |2 StatID |b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List |
915 | _ | _ | |a WoS |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0112 |2 StatID |b Emerging Sources Citation Index |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150 |2 StatID |b Web of Science Core Collection |
920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-He78)C060-20160331 |k C060 |l C060 Biostatistik |x 0 |
920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-He78)G370-20160331 |k G370 |l KKE Neuroonkologie |x 1 |
920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-He78)L101-20160331 |k L101 |l DKTK Heidelberg |x 2 |
980 | _ | _ | |a journal |
980 | _ | _ | |a VDB |
980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-He78)C060-20160331 |
980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-He78)G370-20160331 |
980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-He78)L101-20160331 |
980 | _ | _ | |a UNRESTRICTED |
Library | Collection | CLSMajor | CLSMinor | Language | Author |
---|