% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Rohrmann:141691,
author = {S. Rohrmann$^*$ and V. Katzke$^*$ and R. Kaaks$^*$},
title = {{L}ifestyle and {P}rogression of {L}ower {U}rinary {T}ract
{S}ymptoms in {G}erman {M}en-{R}esults {F}rom the
{EPIC}-{H}eidelberg {C}ohort.},
journal = {Urology},
volume = {120},
issn = {0090-4295},
address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier Science},
reportid = {DKFZ-2018-01962},
pages = {192 - 196},
year = {2018},
abstract = {To examine if lower urinary tract symptom (LUTS)
progression was related to anthropometric and lifestyle
factors.The analysis included 5495 men who participated in
the EPIC-Heidelberg cohort (recruited 1994-1998) and who
reported an International Prostate Symptom Score < 8 at
follow-up 4 (FUP4, 2007-2009), had not reported taking
α-adrenoreceptor antagonists or 5-α reductase inhibitors
or prostate surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia/LUTS
treatment. LUTS progression was defined as an International
Prostate Symptom Score ≥ 8 at FUP5 (2010-2012). Using
logistic regression analysis, education, marital status,
satisfaction with life, satisfaction with health, history of
diabetes and of hypertension, smoking, alcohol consumption,
body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, and physical
activity were examined as potential LUTS risk factors
adjusting for age.Increase in BMI between baseline and FUP4
of ≥ 2 BMI units was related to LUTS progression (odds
ratio 1.30, $95\%$ confidence interval 1.08-1.57) compared
with stable BMI. Compared to men who were very satisfied
with life at baseline, those who were satisfied (1.28,
1.11-1.47), unsatisfied (1.80, 1.31-2.46) or very
unsatisfied with life (1.43, 0.62-3.34) were more likely to
report LUTS progression. Men with longer education had
higher odds of LUTS progression than men with primary
education only (1.25, 1.06-1.48). Adjusting for BMI or
lifestyle factors did not attenuate these associations.
Smoking habits, alcohol consumption, physical activity,
self-reported history of diabetes or hypertension, and
marital status were not related with LUTS progression.Our
results confirm some, but not all previously observed risk
factors for LUTS progression.},
cin = {C020},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C020-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Cancer risk factors and prevention (POF3-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:29940234},
doi = {10.1016/j.urology.2018.06.013},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/141691},
}