% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Iqbal:142437,
author = {K. Iqbal and S. Dietrich and C. Wittenbecher and J.
Krumsiek and T. Kühn$^*$ and M. E. Lacruz and A. Kluttig
and C. Prehn and J. Adamski and M. von Bergen and R.
Kaaks$^*$ and M. B. Schulze and H. Boeing and A. Floegel},
title = {{C}omparison of metabolite networks from four {G}erman
population-based studies.},
journal = {International journal of epidemiology},
volume = {47},
number = {6},
issn = {1464-3685},
address = {Oxford},
publisher = {Oxford Univ. Press},
reportid = {DKFZ-2019-00157},
pages = {2070 - 2081},
year = {2018},
abstract = {Metabolite networks are suggested to reflect biological
pathways in health and disease. However, it is unknown
whether such metabolite networks are reproducible across
different populations. Therefore, the current study aimed to
investigate similarity of metabolite networks in four German
population-based studies.One hundred serum metabolites were
quantified in European Prospective Investigation into Cancer
and Nutrition (EPIC)-Potsdam (n = 2458), EPIC-Heidelberg
(n = 812), KORA (Cooperative Health Research in the
Augsburg Region) (n = 3029) and CARLA (Cardiovascular
Disease, Living and Ageing in Halle) (n = 1427) with
targeted metabolomics. In a cross-sectional analysis,
Gaussian graphical models were used to construct similar
networks of 100 edges each, based on partial correlations of
these metabolites. The four metabolite networks of the top
100 edges were compared based on (i) common features, i.e.
number of common edges, Pearson correlation (r) and hamming
distance (h); and (ii) meta-analysis of the four
networks.Among the four networks, 57 common edges and 66
common nodes (metabolites) were identified. Pairwise network
comparisons showed moderate to high similarity
(r = 63-0.96, h = 7-72), among the networks.
Meta-analysis of the networks showed that, among the 100
edges and 89 nodes of the meta-analytic network, 57 edges
and 66 metabolites were present in all the four networks,
58-76 edges and 75-89 nodes were present in at least three
networks, and 63-84 edges and 76-87 edges were present in at
least two networks. The meta-analytic network showed clear
grouping of 10 sphingolipids, 8 lyso-phosphatidylcholines,
31 acyl-alkyl-phosphatidylcholines, 30
diacyl-phosphatidylcholines, 8 amino acids and 2
acylcarnitines.We found structural similarity in metabolite
networks from four large studies. Using a meta-analytic
network, as a new approach for combining metabolite data
from different studies, closely related metabolites could be
identified, for some of which the biological relationships
in metabolic pathways have been previously described. They
are candidates for further investigation to explore their
potential role in biological processes.},
cin = {C020},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C020-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Cancer risk factors and prevention (POF3-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:29982629},
pmc = {pmc:PMC6280930},
doi = {10.1093/ije/dyy119},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/142437},
}