% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Blker:142857,
author = {H. Bläker and E. Alwers$^*$ and A. Arnold and E. Herpel
and K. E. Tagscherer and W. Roth and L. Jansen$^*$ and V.
Walter$^*$ and M. Kloor and J. Chang-Claude$^*$ and H.
Brenner$^*$ and M. Hoffmeister$^*$},
title = {{T}he {A}ssociation {B}etween {M}utations in {BRAF} and
{C}olorectal {C}ancer-{S}pecific {S}urvival {D}epends on
{M}icrosatellite {S}tatus and {T}umor {S}tage.},
journal = {Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology},
volume = {17},
number = {3},
issn = {1542-3565},
address = {New York, NY},
publisher = {Elsevier Science},
reportid = {DKFZ-2019-00487},
pages = {455 - 462.e6},
year = {2019},
abstract = {Colorectal tumors with mutations in BRAF and microsatellite
stability (MSS) have been associated with adverse outcomes
of patients. Combined tests for microsatellite
instability-high (MSI-H) and BRAF mutations might therefore
be used in risk assessment, particularly for patients with
stage II tumors. We investigate the stage-specific
prognostic value of combined testing for MSI-H and BRAF for
patients with colorectal cancer.We performed a retrospective
analysis of colorectal tumor samples collected from 1995
patients at 22 hospitals in Germany, between 2003 and 2010.
Samples were analyzed for MSI-H using an established
mononucleotide marker panel; BRAF mutations (BRAFV600E) were
detected by Sanger sequencing or in tissue microarray blocks
using immunohistochemistry. Cancers were assigned to
categories of having MSS without mutations in BRAF, MSS with
mutant BRAF, MSI-H without mutations in BRAF, and MSI-H with
mutant BRAF. We investigated the association between tumor
categories with clinical and pathologic features and
patient's overall, disease-specific, and recurrence-free
survival (median follow-up time, 5.1 y).Tumors were stage I
in 364 $(18\%),$ stage II in 678 $(34\%),$ stage III in 673
$(34\%),$ and stage IV $(14\%)$ in 280 patients.
Sixty-three percent of tumors were located in the colon and
$37\%$ in the rectum. Most tumors $(85\%)$ had MSS without
mutations in BRAF, $3\%$ had MSS with mutant BRAF, $7\%$ had
MSI-H without mutations in BRAF, $and 5\%$ had MSI-H with
mutant BRAF. In patients whose tumors were MSI-H, mutation
of BRAF did not significantly affect survival time. Patients
whose tumors had MSS with mutant BRAF had significantly
reduced overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 2.16; $95\%$
CI, 1.54-3.04; P < .001), disease-specific survival (HR,
2.59; $95\%$ CI, 1.77-3.79; P < .001), and recurrence-free
survival (HR, 2.45; $95\%$ CI, 1.70-3.52; P < .001) than
patients whose tumors had MSS without BRAF mutation.
Although BRAF mutations in tumors with MSS were associated
with disease-specific survival of patients with stage III or
IV tumors (P < .001), these features did not affect survival
of patients with stage II tumors (P = .639).In an analysis
of almost 2000 patients with colorectal cancer, we found
BRAF mutations to reduce survival of patients in stage III
or IV (but not stage II) tumors with MSS. These findings do
not support testing stage I or II colorectal tumors for BRAF
mutations, although additional large studies are needed.},
cin = {C070 / C020 / L101 / L501},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C070-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)C020-20160331 /
I:(DE-He78)L101-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)L501-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Cancer risk factors and prevention (POF3-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:29660527},
doi = {10.1016/j.cgh.2018.04.015},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/142857},
}