000142949 001__ 142949
000142949 005__ 20240229112536.0
000142949 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.3389/fonc.2019.00035
000142949 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:30805305
000142949 0247_ $$2pmc$$apmc:PMC6370688
000142949 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:54082879
000142949 037__ $$aDKFZ-2019-00577
000142949 041__ $$aeng
000142949 082__ $$a610
000142949 1001_ $$aEschke, Robert-Christopher Karl-Richard$$b0
000142949 245__ $$aImpact of Physical Exercise on Growth and Progression of Cancer in Rodents-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
000142949 260__ $$aLausanne$$bFrontiers Media$$c2019
000142949 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000142949 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000142949 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1551693880_21937$$xReview Article
000142949 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000142949 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000142949 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000142949 520__ $$aBackground: Physical exercise is suspected to reduce cancer risk and mortality. So far, little is known about the underlying mechanisms. Although limited, murine models represent a promising attempt in order to gain knowledge in this field. Objective: A systematic review and meta-analysis examining various treatment protocols was conducted in order to determine the impact of exercise on tumor growth in rodents. Methods: PubMed, Google scholar and System for information on Gray literature in Europe were screened from inception to October 2017. Risk of bias within individual studies was assessed using the Office of Health Assessment and Translation risk of bias rating tool for human and animal trials. The effect of exercise on tumor growth over and above non-exercise control was pooled using random-effects model. Subgroup analyses were conducted to identify potential moderators. Results: The quality of the included 17 articles ranged between 'probably low' and 'high risk of bias.' A significant reduction in tumor growth in exercising animals compared to controls was detected (Hedges' g = -0.40; 95% CI -0.66 to -0.14, p < 0.01) with between-study heterogeneity (τ2 = 0.217, I2 = 70.28%, p < 0.001). The heterogeneity was partially explained by three moderators representing the in-between group differences of 'maximum daily exercise' R2 = 33% (p < 0.01), 'type of cancer administration' R2 = 28% (p < 0.05), and 'training initiation' R2 = 27% (p < 0.05). Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests that physical exercise leads to reduction of tumor size in rodents. Since 'maximum daily exercise' was found to have at least modest impact on tumor growth, more clinical trials investigating dose-response relationships are needed.
000142949 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-313$$a313 - Cancer risk factors and prevention (POF3-313)$$cPOF3-313$$fPOF III$$x0
000142949 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed,
000142949 7001_ $$aLampit, Amit$$b1
000142949 7001_ $$aSchenk, Alexander$$b2
000142949 7001_ $$aJavelle, Florian$$b3
000142949 7001_ $$0P:(DE-He78)a0c2037d9054be26907a05ae520d5756$$aSteindorf, Karen$$b4$$udkfz
000142949 7001_ $$aDiel, Patrick$$b5
000142949 7001_ $$aBloch, Wilhelm$$b6
000142949 7001_ $$0P:(DE-He78)d05b24af674d8ef2c455634434b67770$$aZimmer, Philipp$$b7$$eLast author$$udkfz
000142949 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2649216-7$$a10.3389/fonc.2019.00035$$gVol. 9, p. 35$$p35$$tFrontiers in oncology$$v9$$x2234-943X$$y2019
000142949 909CO $$ooai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:142949$$pVDB
000142949 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)2036810-0$$6P:(DE-He78)a0c2037d9054be26907a05ae520d5756$$aDeutsches Krebsforschungszentrum$$b4$$kDKFZ
000142949 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)2036810-0$$6P:(DE-He78)d05b24af674d8ef2c455634434b67770$$aDeutsches Krebsforschungszentrum$$b7$$kDKFZ
000142949 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-313$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-310$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-300$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bGesundheit$$lKrebsforschung$$vCancer risk factors and prevention$$x0
000142949 9141_ $$y2019
000142949 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bFRONT ONCOL : 2017
000142949 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000142949 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000142949 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000142949 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0320$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bPubMed Central
000142949 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal
000142949 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ
000142949 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bDOAJ : Blind peer review
000142949 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNV$$2V:(DE-HGF)$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY (No Version)$$bDOAJ
000142949 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List
000142949 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000142949 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000142949 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1110$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Clinical Medicine
000142949 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000142949 9201_ $$0I:(DE-He78)C110-20160331$$kC110$$lBewegung, Präventionsforschung und Krebs$$x0
000142949 980__ $$ajournal
000142949 980__ $$aVDB
000142949 980__ $$aI:(DE-He78)C110-20160331
000142949 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED