% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Eschke:142949,
author = {R. K. Eschke and A. Lampit and A. Schenk and F. Javelle and
K. Steindorf$^*$ and P. Diel and W. Bloch and P. Zimmer$^*$},
title = {{I}mpact of {P}hysical {E}xercise on {G}rowth and
{P}rogression of {C}ancer in {R}odents-{A} {S}ystematic
{R}eview and {M}eta-{A}nalysis.},
journal = {Frontiers in oncology},
volume = {9},
issn = {2234-943X},
address = {Lausanne},
publisher = {Frontiers Media},
reportid = {DKFZ-2019-00577},
pages = {35},
year = {2019},
abstract = {Background: Physical exercise is suspected to reduce cancer
risk and mortality. So far, little is known about the
underlying mechanisms. Although limited, murine models
represent a promising attempt in order to gain knowledge in
this field. Objective: A systematic review and meta-analysis
examining various treatment protocols was conducted in order
to determine the impact of exercise on tumor growth in
rodents. Methods: PubMed, Google scholar and System for
information on Gray literature in Europe were screened from
inception to October 2017. Risk of bias within individual
studies was assessed using the Office of Health Assessment
and Translation risk of bias rating tool for human and
animal trials. The effect of exercise on tumor growth over
and above non-exercise control was pooled using
random-effects model. Subgroup analyses were conducted to
identify potential moderators. Results: The quality of the
included 17 articles ranged between 'probably low' and 'high
risk of bias.' A significant reduction in tumor growth in
exercising animals compared to controls was detected
(Hedges' g = -0.40; $95\%$ CI -0.66 to -0.14, p < 0.01) with
between-study heterogeneity (τ2 = 0.217, I2 = $70.28\%,$ p
< 0.001). The heterogeneity was partially explained by three
moderators representing the in-between group differences of
'maximum daily exercise' R2 = $33\%$ (p < 0.01), 'type of
cancer administration' R2 = $28\%$ (p < 0.05), and 'training
initiation' R2 = $27\%$ (p < 0.05). Conclusion: This
meta-analysis suggests that physical exercise leads to
reduction of tumor size in rodents. Since 'maximum daily
exercise' was found to have at least modest impact on tumor
growth, more clinical trials investigating dose-response
relationships are needed.},
subtyp = {Review Article},
cin = {C110},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C110-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Cancer risk factors and prevention (POF3-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:30805305},
pmc = {pmc:PMC6370688},
doi = {10.3389/fonc.2019.00035},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/142949},
}