% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Knppel:143000,
author = {S. Knüppel and M. Clemens and J. Conrad and S. Gastell and
K. B. Michels and M. Leitzmann and L. Krist and T. Pischon
and G. Krause and W. Ahrens and N. Ebert and K.-H. Jöckel
and A. Kluttig and N. Obi and R. Kaaks$^*$ and W. Lieb and
S. Schipf and H. Brenner$^*$ and T. Heuer and U. Harttig and
J. Linseisen and U. Nöthlings and H. Boeing},
title = {{D}esign and characterization of dietary assessment in the
{G}erman {N}ational {C}ohort.},
journal = {European journal of clinical nutrition},
volume = {73},
number = {11},
issn = {1476-5640},
address = {New York, NY},
publisher = {Nature Publ. Group},
reportid = {DKFZ-2019-00625},
pages = {1480-1491},
year = {2019},
note = {73(11):1480-1491},
abstract = {The aim of the study was to describe a novel dietary
assessment strategy based on two instruments complemented by
information from an external population applied to estimate
usual food intake in the large-scale multicenter German
National Cohort (GNC). As proof of concept, we applied the
assessment strategy to data from a pretest study (2012-2013)
to assess the feasibility of the novel assessment
strategy.First, the consumption probability for each
individual was modeled using three 24 h food lists
(24h-FLs) and frequencies from one food frequency
questionnaire (FFQ). Second, daily consumed food amounts
were estimated from the representative German National
Nutrition Survey II (NVS II) taking the characteristics of
the participants into account. Usual food intake was
estimated using the product of consumption probability and
amounts.We estimated usual intake of 41 food groups in 318
men and 377 women. The participation proportion was 100,
84.4, and $68.5\%$ for the first, second, and third 24h-FL,
respectively. We observed no associations between the
probability of participating and lifestyle factors. The
estimated distributions of usual food intakes were plausible
and total energy was estimated to be 2707 kcal/day for men
and 2103 kcal/day for women. The estimated consumption
frequencies did not differ substantially between men and
women with only few exceptions. The differences in energy
intake between men and women were mostly due to differences
in estimated daily amounts.The combination of repeated
24h-FLs, a FFQ, and consumption-day amounts from a reference
population represents a user-friendly dietary assessment
approach having generated plausible, but not yet validated,
food intake values in the pretest study.},
cin = {C020 / C120 / C070 / L101},
ddc = {630},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C020-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)C120-20160331 /
I:(DE-He78)C070-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)L101-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Cancer risk factors and prevention (POF3-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:30647440},
doi = {10.1038/s41430-018-0383-8},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/143000},
}