% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Gies:143170,
author = {A. Gies$^*$ and L. Gruner$^*$ and P. Schrotz-King$^*$ and
H. Brenner$^*$},
title = {{E}ffect of {I}mperfect {C}ompliance {W}ith {I}nstructions
for {F}ecal {S}ample {C}ollection on {D}iagnostic
{P}erformance of 9 {F}ecal {I}mmunochemical {T}ests.},
journal = {Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology},
volume = {17},
number = {9},
issn = {1542-3565},
address = {New York, NY},
publisher = {Elsevier Science},
reportid = {DKFZ-2019-00769},
pages = {1829-1839.e4},
year = {2019},
abstract = {Fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) measure hemoglobin in
stool to identify individuals at risk for colorectal cancer
(CRC). However, there are many different FITs, with
different instructions for fecal sample collection. In
routine practice, participants do not always exactly follow
these instructions. We assessed the effects of violations of
fecal sampling instructions on the diagnostic performance of
9 quantitative FITs.We obtained stool samples from 76
patients with CRC scheduled for surgery at 4 hospitals in
Germany and 100 participants without advanced neoplasms who
participated in a prospective colonoscopy screening program.
We filled fecal sample tubes according to the manufacturers'
instructions or with 3 violations that are likely to occur
in routine practice. The diagnostic performance was assessed
for a total of 6336 FIT samples (176 participants x 9 FITs x
4 sampling methods).Sample collection instructions varied
widely among FITs but included 3 key components: multiple
insertions of sampling rod into stool, visual check of rod
for complete filling with stool, and once-only insertion of
stool-filled rod into the tube. Violation of the first 2
components (inserting the rod into the stool sample only 1
time or not visually checking the rod for complete filling)
reduced levels of hemoglobin measured. However, the effect
on diagnostic performance was generally small. Violation of
the third component (insertion of more stool into the tube
than recommended) increased levels of hemoglobin measured in
samples and identified more patients with CRC (increase of
median sensitivity by almost $10\%$ units) at a small loss
of specificity (decrease of median specificity by $2\%$
units), and produced highest area under the curve for
detection of CRC cases for 6 FITs.Violations of fecal
sampling instructions can lead to non-negligible variations
in fecal hemoglobin measurements. The limited adverse
effects on diagnostic performance indicate the robustness of
FITs. The potential for increasing diagnostic performance by
collecting more stool material should be followed up in
further research.},
cin = {C070 / C120},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C070-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)C120-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Cancer risk factors and prevention (POF3-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:30851476},
doi = {10.1016/j.cgh.2019.03.001},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/143170},
}