% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Brinker:143536,
author = {T. J. Brinker$^*$ and J. Alfitian and W. Seeger and D. A.
Groneberg and C. von Kalle$^*$ and A. H. Enk and F. J. F.
Herth and M. Kreuter and C. M. Bauer and M. Gatzka and J. L.
Suhre},
title = {{A} {F}ace-{A}ging {S}moking {P}revention/{C}essation
{I}ntervention for {N}ursery {S}chool {S}tudents in
{G}ermany: {A}n {A}ppearance-{F}ocused {I}nterventional
{S}tudy.},
journal = {International journal of environmental research and public
health},
volume = {15},
number = {8},
issn = {1660-4601},
address = {Basel},
publisher = {MDPI AG},
reportid = {DKFZ-2019-01119},
pages = {1656},
year = {2018},
abstract = {The Education Against Tobacco (EAT) network delivers
smoking prevention advice in secondary schools, typically
using the mirroring approach (i.e., a 'selfie' altered with
a face-aging app and shared with a class). In November 2017,
however, the German assembly of EAT opted to expand its
remit to include nursing students. To assess the
transferability of the existing approach, we implemented it
with the self-developed face-aging app 'Smokerface' (=mixed
- methods approach) in six nursing schools. Anonymous
questionnaires were used to assess the perceptions of 197
students (age 18⁻40 years; $83.8\%$ female; $26.4\%$
smokers; $23.3\%$ daily smokers) collecting qualitative and
quantitative data for our cross-sectional study. Most
students perceived the intervention to be fun $(73.3\%),$
but a minority disagreed that their own animated selfie
$(25.9\%)$ or the reaction of their peers $(29.5\%)$ had
motivated them to stop smoking. The impact on motivation not
to smoke was considerably lower than experienced with
seventh graders $(63.2\%$ vs. $42.0\%;$ notably, more
smokers also disagreed $(45.1\%)$ than agreed $(23.5\%)$
with this statement. Agreement rates on the motivation not
to smoke item were higher in females than in males and in
year 2⁻3 than in year 1 students. Potential improvements
included greater focus on pathology $(29\%)$ and discussing
external factors $(26\%).$ Overall, the intervention seemed
to be appealing for nursing students.},
cin = {G100 / L101},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)G100-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)L101-20160331},
pnm = {317 - Translational cancer research (POF3-317)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-317},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:30081549},
pmc = {pmc:PMC6121507},
doi = {10.3390/ijerph15081656},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/143536},
}